CORRUPDATE

Jeffrey Immelt is also on the board of directors at the New York Federal Reserve Bank. What the hell?

Progressives: the Enemy of Human Progress

It has been said recently that I do not understand what it means to be "working class" and that the America I promote is one ruled by "special interests," as opposed to the current version of America, which I assume you believe is nice and honest and pro-democracy and all that good stuff. To anyone ignorant enough to make such comments or even think such things, I have but one suggestion: get your tubes tied. The human race is in bad shape, and if poorly-bred half witted "progressives" like you are allowed to contaminate the gene-pool much longer, we will soon be back in the trees flinging feces at each other and competing for nuts and bananas. If you can't afford to be sterilized, you're in luck, because I have an alternate choice to offer you: go drink Drano.

Now that I'm properly vented, let's talk about special interests. First of all, my only interest, as I have said in every post on this blog, is the fundamental laws of this nation. The rights offered me in the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence are the only thing I have to gain by speaking out against the current form of the federal government. I employ no man and I work for myself, chiseling my sustenance with my wits and my hands. I receive NOTHING for my words or my thoughts or my views. I have no dog in this fight. No, I AM the dog. And I am fighting for my country in every way my meager station in life allows me to.

Would you like to know who really qualifies as a "special interest?" I mean, you meat-headed crapsacks really think that people like me are the problem? You think your government is really YOUR government, devoid of all "special interest?" Then how do you explain guys like Jeffrey Immelt? He's only one man, but he represents the typical officer of the new empire you think serves you. He is the chairman of the board and chief executive officer of General Electric. He earns around 15million dollars per year for his work with GE, which is about, ho, hum, ALMOST 15million more dollars than I earn in a year. A major portion of his compensation comes in the form of GE company stock. As head of GE he controls NBC Universal, which includes MSNBC, CNBC, and the Weather Channel, which are all 100% liberally biased (yes, even the Weather Channel, which could just as well have been called the Al Gore Channel). He also controls GE Capital, which heads up GE's environmental and energy affairs, and GE Energy Infrastructure, which are all based largely on the model of promoting the theory of global warming and then coming up with dog barf quality "green" technologies and making hundreds of billions of dollars off of them, most of those dollars coming from sweet little government contracts. Immelt is also in control of GE Technology Infrastructure, which generates an absurd amount of revenue from one of it's subsidiaries, GE Healthcare.

So why is this guy a problem? Well, Time Magazine considers him one of the 100 most influential people in the world, and he just happens to be an official "adviser" to the Obama administration, advising the "president" on such issues as the economy, HEALTHCARE, and ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES. Surprise, surprise, please cut out my eyes. General Electric is known as one of the largest, if not THE largest lobbying group in the country, and Jeffrey Immelt is it's captain. He is a walking, breathing, power-hungry special interest in the fleshy form of a dumpy-looking old man, in addition to probably being a harbinger of the actual devil. Now, if it were up to me, Immelt and the countless other lobbyists currently pulling the strings of our government would be tarred and feathered on national television for the corruption he promotes and represents. So tell me again how I'm for special interests? Oh yeah. You can't anymore. Well, you can always just eat me instead.

PAGING DOCTOR PLANT

Unless you’ve been in a coma for the last few weeks, you’ve probably noticed all the “angry mobs” going crazy at various town hall meetings on healthcare reform in America. And unless your coma began eight years ago, you should also be aware that it is alarmingly hypocritical of the Democrats to call the protesters at these town hall meetings “mobs.”

Let’s look back at the entire two-term presidency of George W. Bush. On almost a daily basis president Bush was hanged, burned, shot, and decapitated in effigy by masked dissidents in the streets of major cities all around the country, and for that matter, all around the world. Protesters rallied with signs depicting George W. Bush made to look like Adolf Hitler. Cars and buildings were vandalized and innocent bystanders were assaulted as the left side of America treated us to their brand of first amendment application. And amid all of this, the Democrats in Washington and their mouthpiece the media ate it all up and said how inspiring it all was.

But now that average American citizens, responsible, working-class taxpayers who have never protested a thing in their lives, are speaking out against the forced turn to Communism, the left is appalled. In an editorial for NY Times published on the 11th of this month, Maureen Dowd, either unable to read what she is typing, evil, stupid, ignorant, or under the influence of auto-writing, made the observation, “Instead of a multicultural tableau of beaming young idealists on screen, we see ugly scenes of mostly older and white malcontents, disrupting forums where others have come to actually learn something. Instead of hope, we get swastikas, death threats and T-shirts proclaiming ‘Proud Member of the Mob.’” Dowd Continues, “President Obama has proven quicksilver instincts, but not in this case. You would think that a politician schooled in community organizing and the foul balls of a presidential campaign would be ready to squash this kind of nuttiness”

Foul balls? I’ll show you foul balls. On second thought, I’ll leave that one alone.

Why do lefties like Hillary Clinton say things like “I'm sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic. We need to stand up and say we're Americans, and we have the right to debate and disagree with any administration,” as long as a Republican is in office, but if you so much as raise an eyebrow to the immortal Barack, you’re suddenly un-American? Oh right, I just remembered why. It’s not that people are “protesting” that makes the Democrats mad. It’s the fact that these people are going to TOWN HALL meetings and EXPRESSING THEIR OPINIONS to ELECTED OFFICIALS that makes them made. Wait. Isn’t that the whole point of a town hall meeting? I mean, where else can you actually meet the official you elected face to face and have a guarantee that they will hear you? Oh yeah, you’re supposed to call them and set up an appointment at their office. Good luck making that happen.

But now all the hypocrisy of pointing the finger and poo-pooing dissidents is starting to backfire in the faces of the Democrats. So they are adopting a new tactic: Soviet-style town hall planted audiences. At a town hall hosted by Texas Representative Sheila Jackson Lee, a Democrat, a supporter named Roxana Mayer got the mic and identified herself as a “general practitioner” (that’s a type of doctor, for all my disabled readers) and claimed to have been working as such for four years. Sheila Jackson Lee hugged Mayer and called for applause on the good doctor’s behalf. Mayer made her statement and silenced all those ugly old white people who had said that doctors were opposed to the Obama health plan, and sat down, having made a slam dunk for the Democrats. Except for one little detail. It turns out that Roxana Mayer isn’t really a doctor. TEE-HEE! Oh, and one more insignificant little fact. Ms. Mayer is actually an official Texas Delegate for… guess who… Barack Obama! LOL!

That’s a good one. And here’s another. At a town hall meeting in Portsmouth, New Hampshire hosted by the big dawwwggg Obama himself, a cute cuddly wuddly little girl named Julia Hall stood up to ask a question. The “president” said he was happy to meet Julia for the first time, and she proceeded with her question, saying, “As I was walking in, I saw a lot of signs outside saying mean things about reforming health care. How do kids know what is true, and why do people want a new system that can – that help more of us?”

The poor little girl saw mean signs! Hmmpf L Well, as it turns out for the Democrats, the devil is always in the details, and little Julia Hall is actually the daughter of a donor and contributor to Obama’s campaign for president named Kathleen Hall, a woman who has met Barack Obama multiple times and even has pictures of herself with the “president” on her facebook page. Also Kathleen Hall’s facebook page is a list of her “friends,” simple, down-to-earth, reg’lar folks, like: Democrat Martha Coakley, Massachusetts attorney general; Adam Parkhomenko, former aide to Hillary Clinton; Addisu Demissie, national political director of Organizing for America and former Ohio Get out The Vote director of Obama for America; Adrienne Elrod, chief of staff to Rep. Loretta Sanchez, D-Calif.; Huffington Post blogger Alan Rosenblatt, associate director for online advocacy at the Center for American Progress; and Alayna Van Tassel, budget and policy director for Massachusetts Sen. Pat Jehlen.

Apparently, Kathleen “won” tickets to the event and submitted her daughter’s question beforehand in hopes that the omnipotent Obama would shine his light on her disheartened little girl and let her have some mic time. Good thing Barack decided to call on that unfamiliar little girl, because it turned out to be another whiz-bang slam dunk for his team.

So where am I going with all of this? I could write a hundred more pages about all the plants at these town hall meetings, but I’ll spare you so you can get back to your important life of watching reality TV and wiping boogers under the couch. But in the tradition of wrapping up with some sort of point, I’ll finish by telling you that I’m just fed up with the double standards of the Democrats, the free pass they have with the media, these cold war Russia town hall meetings, and brainless anomalies like you who refuse to see the Democrats for what they really are: deceptive, hypocritical, agenda-driven opportunists bent on dragging this country down to the eighth circle of hell. Don’t get me wrong, the Republicans aren’t any better, but they aren’t the problem right now. Again I say this: it comes down to trust. And with all the hypocrisy the Democrats keep coming up with, can you really trust them to tell the truth about anything? Go back and look at political news from the past eight years and you’ll see what I mean by hypocrisy. Then you can answer the question posed in this paragraph.

Open thy mouth, Obama, and devour thine own success.

Of all the baffling, mind-numbing, ridiculous bragging points that still seem to be floating around somewhere in the bizzaro-world in which the media exists, there is one that really defecates on reason's back more than all the others combined. What I am referring to is that most dishonest claim that Barack Hussein Obama is a (insert your own adjective) brilliant, accomplished, impressive, eloquent, etc... public speaker. If you were to dig through the outbox of my email account, you would find emails which I sent to various friends and familial embarrassments in which I made the point that Obama can certainly come up with many smooth words in rapid succession, much more rapidly than George W. Bush, but when you really take his words and try to boil them down to something meaningful, the whole of his statements evaporates into thin air. He talks and talks and talks, and yet he says absolutely nothing. And if he ever does manage to speak with purpose and real intent, the very next day he shows up at some other town hall or labor union meeting on how to ruin the world, and negates the thing that he said the day before, thus rendering the same result of nothing being said.

"President" Obama vowed from day one of his campaign that he would be the most visible "president" ever. Many times each day Barry appears on TV shows, on the internet, on the radio, making some slick speech about some new social-justice program he's cooked up. But his quest for airtime is now beginning to work against him. That is because he is a huckster, a shill, and a snake-oil salesmen who plays to the crowd and says whatever he feels will win any given crowd over to his side. But his problem is that he forgets to check his various pitches against each other, and we have each of them on tape. So if he says in one speech that his new healthcare program will be the first successful government program ever and that it will be totally devoid of problems, he better by golly say the same thing in his next speech. But wait, he's supposed to be a genius at public speaking, right? I mean, he couldn't possibly be a big enough jackass to say that his own plan for healthcare is likely to flop like a dying fish, right?

Wrong. On Tuesday, at a town hall meeting in New Hampshire, a man named Ben Hershenson asked the "president," "Who can compete with the government?" And in response, the talented statesmen Obama said this: "As long as they have a good product and the government plan has to sustain itself through premiums and other non-tax revenue, private insurers should be able to compete with the government plan. They do it all the time…UPS and FedEx are doing just fine. . . . It’s the Post Office that’s always having problems." Good one, Barry. Way to put a nice shine on that gold-plated turd you've been peddling around the country all summer.

Reader, I challenge you to seriously pay attention to your "president" when he talks. Don't just go into a trance or get hypnotized by his soothing voice like you usually do, but really try to overcome your game show-induced ADD long enough to get the actual point of what he's saying. And then compare those points to one another, and see if there's any semblance of consistency or honesty. And then ask yourself how you can trust a person who treats the presidency like a used car sales job. That's what it comes down to. Trust. Barack's approval ratings are almost as low as George W. Bush's ratings when he left office. That is because the lazy, thoughtless, ignorant dregs that voted for "change" are now learning what that truly means, and they don't like it. They no longer trust the man that claimed he was the messiah and turned out to be the devil. Better late than never. Hopefully.

A Father a Day, part one

Over the next few weeks, I will be posting short biographies for the Founding Fathers of the United States of America. Naturally, I will be posting information on the larger-than-life legends of the revolution, but I will also try to give information on every-day patriots who we no less owe our respect and love for their help in giving birth to the free country we now take for granted. Today’s “Father” is actually a woman who loved the cause of liberty so much that she was more willing to fight for it than many of the men at the time. Her story is heart-rending and inspirational:


Margaret “Molly” Corbin

Margaret “Molly” Corbin was born Margaret Cochran near Chambersburg, Pennsylvania on November 12, 1751. When she was five years old her family was attacked in the course of an Indian raid, and thus she was orphaned and raised by relatives. At the age of 21 she married John Corbin. Four years later, John enlisted with the First Company of Pennsylvania Artillery as a matross, loading and firing cannon in defense of his newly-formed nation. Margaret volunteered as a camp follower, working with other soldiers’ wives to cook for the soldiers, wash their clothing, and attending to other general needs of the army as well as caring for sick and wounded soldiers.

But for Margaret Corbin, her dedication to the cause of freedom did not stop at just domestic duties. On November 16, 1776, while stationed inside Fort Washington in New York, the fort came under a fierce attack by British and Hessian troops. In the face of the onslaught of the notoriously brutal and ruthless Hessians, Margaret took it upon herself to assist her husband, John, in firing a cannon at the advancing forces. After her husband was killed in the course of the siege, Margaret, instead of surrendering, went about loading and firing the cannon by herself until her jaw, arm, and chest were torn and mangled by a round of grapeshot.

The British ultimately took the fort. When they found Margaret and observed her horrific wounds, they allowed her to be “paroled,” and she was taken to Philadelphia to recover, although her wounds never healed completely. Margaret Corbin’s story and situation came to the attention of the Continental Congress and on July 6, 1779, the Congress awarded her a monthly pension, making Margaret the first American woman to receive a military pension. She was also awarded $30 to cover the costs of her initial recovery as well as a new set of clothes. She remained on the Congressional pension until her death at the age of 48 on January 16, 1800 in Highland Falls, New York.

Recommended Reading

Following are a few books and other literature which I find extremely important for an American living under the dictatorship of Barack Obama to read. I believe that reading these materials will enable you to draw the conclusions necessary to motivate you to act in defense of your country.

Animal Farm- by George Orwell

Mein Kampf- by Adolf Hitler

Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance- by Barack Hussein Obama

It Can't Happen Here- by Sinclair Lewis

The Constitution of the United States of America- by the Constitutional Convention of 1787

United States Declaration of Independence- by the Continental Congress of 1776

George Washington's Farewell Address- by George Washington

Gettysburg Address- by Abraham Lincoln

Common Sense- by Thomas Paine

The Holy Bible- by the Prophets, from God

1776- by David McCullough

John Adams- by David McCullough

UPDATE

***Before you read this post, please make yourself familiar with the Privacy Act of 1974.***

Not surprisingly, some of the feedback on my last post was so stupid I almost committed suicide. Let me make it even clearer for you dullards. The White House isn't just interested in things on the internet that spread "disinformation." They refer specifically to "rumors" said in "casual conversation." And when you hear such "rumors," you are asked to "flag" the White House and bring such disinformation to their attention so they can "keep track" of it. And what do they plan on doing with such information? Do you really believe that the White House, the most powerful institution in the world, with the ability to listen to anything being said within a half-mile of a cell phone, needs ordinary citizens to clue them in on what the people are saying about the "president" and his train wreck healthcare bill?

Wake up, you vegetable. This finger-pointing request is such a glaring violation of the freedom of speech, you ought to be ashamed of yourself for not catching it. There is nothing innocent when the executive branch of a government begins enlisting civilians in the hunt for people who make statements that stand in opposition to that executive branch. But wait, isn't Obama just trying to keep track of statements and things, and not people? No way, Che. What is a statement if not the will of an individual? Can you really incriminate a statement without incriminating the person who made it? Statements, or items of "information," or "rumors," if you will, do not form themselves out of thin air.

No, my fellow subjects. The "president" is fulfilling his campaign promise to create a civilian security force that will keep watch on their neighbors. With such a promise having been officially made already, there is no other interpretation. This is no small thing. It should be considered with the full gravity of the office behind it. We aren't talking about a private citizen asking a friend to look for mean things being said about them on facebook. It is the White House, the presidency. And this fishing trip goes way beyond their realm of power and spits on the back of the constitution that gives them that power. But that shouldn't surprise you either, since the "president" also told us during his campaign that he doesn't much care for the constitution. Oh, you don't believe me? Let me enlighten you. According to Barack Hussein Obama, "as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it's been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties."

Interpret that however you want, but if you interpret it any differently than I do, you are without a doubt an embarrassment to your ancestors.

Go ahead and crap your pants. It's okay.

This has been getting a lot of time on radio and FOX news since yesterday, but in case you've been in a cave during that time, let me be the first to bring this to your attention. This is from the official White House website:

"There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain emails or through casual conversation. Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov."

If you're a brain-washed inbred half-wit, there's probably nothing in that request that strikes you as wrong. But to me, an American who loves my freedom and the history of my country, this is possibly the most frightening paragraph I've ever read in my life. When did it become the business of the White House to tell citizens that we should act as informants on our neighbors? Is this still a free country, or is this already the extension of communist China the "president" has been trying to create? I keep expecting Mao to jump out from behind Obama and say SURPRISE! My friends, it is our sacred right to disagree with our government and to express such feelings however we want without the fear of retribution or penalty, and yet the White House wants to "keep track" of anyone who openly disagrees with a political policy. For what purpose? HOW OBVIOUS DOES IT NEED TO GET BEFORE YOU WAKE UP AND REALIZE THAT YOU'RE LIVING IN THE USSR?! Damn you all. You're being marched to your deaths and you don't even care.

Red, White, and Bruised (part four): GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME GOVERNMENT HEALTHCARE!

Welcome back, geniuses and morons. Or as I like to say, people who agree with me and those who do not, respectively. I’m here to warn you about the death-warrant the “president” has written for all Americans in the form of government-sponsored healthcare. Now I’m aware that a few of you are still bogged down in the belief that such a thing would be good for America, because you heard some co-worker pothead from Potsdam or some other god-forsaken hell-hole of a European country say that their country’s government healthcare is the best in the world. But if this is the case, why do these people live here in the United States? And why do people from virtually every country with government healthcare end up selling their houses and all that they have so they can pay for American healthcare when they discover cancer or heart disease or some other life-threatening health concern? Answer: because universal healthcare is a scam that kills people.

Around 91% of Americans have health insurance, and around 84% of those people are satisfied with their coverage and the healthcare they receive by it. So to keep that huge chunk of people quiet, the extremely powerful and dangerous globalists that support the healthcare reform bill are utilizing every resource they have to convince those people that they will have the option to keep their current health insurance. But thanks to the miracle of video cameras, we have Barack Obama on tape saying that the only healthcare plan he could get behind is a single-payer system, meaning a system that is entirely government-controlled, and totally devoid of private insurance companies and private care providers. Obama’s propagandists are out in full force stating that these videos and quotes are simply being taken out of context. But the bill itself contains a provision for rendering all new private insurance policies illegal, and if you lose your private insurance, you would have to go on the government plan. So when the big B.O. said a couple of years ago that he expects a transition period of ten to twenty years before all Americans find themselves stuck with government healthcare, the only possible interpretation of that statement is that he meant it. His new bill confirms this.

The bill in question also provides for forced in-home vaccinations at the discretion of the government. In short, this means that the federal government can make any given vaccine mandatory for any given person, and then send government agents to your home to administer a “vaccine intervention” for the good of the community. I’m aware that some of you are functioning on little more than a brain stem, and to you zombies I’m sure this sounds too conspiracy-theorist to be credible, but to anyone with a moderate degree of historical knowledge it sets in motion a dangerous chain of events when you give a corrupt government the authority to inject anyone they want to with any chemicals they feel like.

And let's not forget about the age-priority structure upon which this plan is built. If anyone reading this is under the age of fourteen or over the age of forty, you might as well kill yourself now because if you get sick, forget about finding a doctor who will treat you. As the plan goes, anyone that falls outside of the priority window will only get left-over healthcare. And as anyone from Canada can tell you, there is no such thing as surplus healthcare in a universal system. Quite the contrary, there is never ENOUGH healthcare in a universal system. Oh well, sorry mom, the government says you're too old for those antibiotics. See you in hell.

Equally as alarming as the content of the bill itself is the speed at which its proponents are trying to ramrod it through to a vote. When pressed to answer why they don't know the contents of the bill, its supporters make the argument that the bill is more than one thousand pages long and it is unreasonable to expect that those who will be voting on the bill should actually take the time to read it! Then why in the hell do they want to vote on it so soon?! If you have an iota of common sense in that chickpea democrat brain of yours, this should immediately disturb you and make your blood boil. What are they hiding in the thousands of pages of this bill? With such inevitably serious ramifications, why is this issue being pushed at such a rapid rate? They don't want to allow enough time to read the bill because they know that if the bill is read in depth, the truly ugly nature of its content will be exposed, and their chance to force universal healthcare down your throat will be dead and buried forever. That is why they tell you to be satisfied with the official summary of the bill, and just don't worry your little head about the other 998 pages. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!

Well, with all that has been said on this issue, and with all that you can find for yourself, I will say no more about the bill itself. But how are the people actually responding to the prospect of DMV-style healthcare? Just take a look at any random “town hall” meeting being held across the new Soviet States of America and the scene you will see is one of desperate, vicious, fearful, indignant revolt. When the “president” sends his human-jackhammers out into the public to force a tunnel through the crowds so he can railroad his policies through to ratification, the once loud and arrogant con-artists find that there is no p.a. system loud enough to make their lies audible over the voice of the American people, and these hacks are trembling at the site of their political careers crashing to the ground.

But the “president” plays it cool, as always, labeling such legally-assembled protesters “mobs” and “manufactured astroturf.” When George W. Bush was in office and community-organizers like Barack Obama went about leading protests against the president, the media considered such gatherings to be patriotic assemblies; responsible citizens exercising their constitutional right to seek redress for their grievances. But when genuine, ordinary Americans seek out the proper venues wherein answers to logical questions should be found, the same media actively portrays such assemblies as nothing more than Republican shenanigans, even when the protesters have a majority of the American populace behind them, according to the most recent liberally-biased polls. In fact, the media has become so corrupt and unreliable that when ten thousand people attended a rally in Columbus Ohio to peacefully protest the “president’s” policies, the few media outlets that covered the event reported a maximum of three hundred people present.

So a little more than half-a-year into this administration’s first term, and the United States is in real danger of no longer existing as a republic. If nearly all of us oppose an unconstitutional policy and it gets shoved through anyway, how can we call our country a republic? If the majority of us who oppose government healthcare are ignored and this communist “president” gets his way, I don’t want to hear any regrets or complaints out of you few remaining idiots who still support Obama and his band of Chicago mobsters when the government denies your application for life-saving surgery. To me, the refusal of life support to millions of retards will be the only good thing to come out of all of this.