Following are a few books and other literature which I find extremely important for an American living under the dictatorship of Barack Obama to read. I believe that reading these materials will enable you to draw the conclusions necessary to motivate you to act in defense of your country.
Animal Farm- by George Orwell
Mein Kampf- by Adolf Hitler
Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance- by Barack Hussein Obama
It Can't Happen Here- by Sinclair Lewis
The Constitution of the United States of America- by the Constitutional Convention of 1787
United States Declaration of Independence- by the Continental Congress of 1776
George Washington's Farewell Address- by George Washington
Gettysburg Address- by Abraham Lincoln
Common Sense- by Thomas Paine
The Holy Bible- by the Prophets, from God
1776- by David McCullough
John Adams- by David McCullough
Friday, August 7, 2009
Thursday, August 6, 2009
UPDATE
***Before you read this post, please make yourself familiar with the Privacy Act of 1974.***
Not surprisingly, some of the feedback on my last post was so stupid I almost committed suicide. Let me make it even clearer for you dullards. The White House isn't just interested in things on the internet that spread "disinformation." They refer specifically to "rumors" said in "casual conversation." And when you hear such "rumors," you are asked to "flag" the White House and bring such disinformation to their attention so they can "keep track" of it. And what do they plan on doing with such information? Do you really believe that the White House, the most powerful institution in the world, with the ability to listen to anything being said within a half-mile of a cell phone, needs ordinary citizens to clue them in on what the people are saying about the "president" and his train wreck healthcare bill?
Wake up, you vegetable. This finger-pointing request is such a glaring violation of the freedom of speech, you ought to be ashamed of yourself for not catching it. There is nothing innocent when the executive branch of a government begins enlisting civilians in the hunt for people who make statements that stand in opposition to that executive branch. But wait, isn't Obama just trying to keep track of statements and things, and not people? No way, Che. What is a statement if not the will of an individual? Can you really incriminate a statement without incriminating the person who made it? Statements, or items of "information," or "rumors," if you will, do not form themselves out of thin air.
No, my fellow subjects. The "president" is fulfilling his campaign promise to create a civilian security force that will keep watch on their neighbors. With such a promise having been officially made already, there is no other interpretation. This is no small thing. It should be considered with the full gravity of the office behind it. We aren't talking about a private citizen asking a friend to look for mean things being said about them on facebook. It is the White House, the presidency. And this fishing trip goes way beyond their realm of power and spits on the back of the constitution that gives them that power. But that shouldn't surprise you either, since the "president" also told us during his campaign that he doesn't much care for the constitution. Oh, you don't believe me? Let me enlighten you. According to Barack Hussein Obama, "as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it's been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties."
Interpret that however you want, but if you interpret it any differently than I do, you are without a doubt an embarrassment to your ancestors.
Not surprisingly, some of the feedback on my last post was so stupid I almost committed suicide. Let me make it even clearer for you dullards. The White House isn't just interested in things on the internet that spread "disinformation." They refer specifically to "rumors" said in "casual conversation." And when you hear such "rumors," you are asked to "flag" the White House and bring such disinformation to their attention so they can "keep track" of it. And what do they plan on doing with such information? Do you really believe that the White House, the most powerful institution in the world, with the ability to listen to anything being said within a half-mile of a cell phone, needs ordinary citizens to clue them in on what the people are saying about the "president" and his train wreck healthcare bill?
Wake up, you vegetable. This finger-pointing request is such a glaring violation of the freedom of speech, you ought to be ashamed of yourself for not catching it. There is nothing innocent when the executive branch of a government begins enlisting civilians in the hunt for people who make statements that stand in opposition to that executive branch. But wait, isn't Obama just trying to keep track of statements and things, and not people? No way, Che. What is a statement if not the will of an individual? Can you really incriminate a statement without incriminating the person who made it? Statements, or items of "information," or "rumors," if you will, do not form themselves out of thin air.
No, my fellow subjects. The "president" is fulfilling his campaign promise to create a civilian security force that will keep watch on their neighbors. With such a promise having been officially made already, there is no other interpretation. This is no small thing. It should be considered with the full gravity of the office behind it. We aren't talking about a private citizen asking a friend to look for mean things being said about them on facebook. It is the White House, the presidency. And this fishing trip goes way beyond their realm of power and spits on the back of the constitution that gives them that power. But that shouldn't surprise you either, since the "president" also told us during his campaign that he doesn't much care for the constitution. Oh, you don't believe me? Let me enlighten you. According to Barack Hussein Obama, "as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it's been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties."
Interpret that however you want, but if you interpret it any differently than I do, you are without a doubt an embarrassment to your ancestors.
Go ahead and crap your pants. It's okay.
This has been getting a lot of time on radio and FOX news since yesterday, but in case you've been in a cave during that time, let me be the first to bring this to your attention. This is from the official White House website:
"There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain emails or through casual conversation. Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov."
If you're a brain-washed inbred half-wit, there's probably nothing in that request that strikes you as wrong. But to me, an American who loves my freedom and the history of my country, this is possibly the most frightening paragraph I've ever read in my life. When did it become the business of the White House to tell citizens that we should act as informants on our neighbors? Is this still a free country, or is this already the extension of communist China the "president" has been trying to create? I keep expecting Mao to jump out from behind Obama and say SURPRISE! My friends, it is our sacred right to disagree with our government and to express such feelings however we want without the fear of retribution or penalty, and yet the White House wants to "keep track" of anyone who openly disagrees with a political policy. For what purpose? HOW OBVIOUS DOES IT NEED TO GET BEFORE YOU WAKE UP AND REALIZE THAT YOU'RE LIVING IN THE USSR?! Damn you all. You're being marched to your deaths and you don't even care.
"There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain emails or through casual conversation. Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov."
If you're a brain-washed inbred half-wit, there's probably nothing in that request that strikes you as wrong. But to me, an American who loves my freedom and the history of my country, this is possibly the most frightening paragraph I've ever read in my life. When did it become the business of the White House to tell citizens that we should act as informants on our neighbors? Is this still a free country, or is this already the extension of communist China the "president" has been trying to create? I keep expecting Mao to jump out from behind Obama and say SURPRISE! My friends, it is our sacred right to disagree with our government and to express such feelings however we want without the fear of retribution or penalty, and yet the White House wants to "keep track" of anyone who openly disagrees with a political policy. For what purpose? HOW OBVIOUS DOES IT NEED TO GET BEFORE YOU WAKE UP AND REALIZE THAT YOU'RE LIVING IN THE USSR?! Damn you all. You're being marched to your deaths and you don't even care.
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Red, White, and Bruised (part four): GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME GOVERNMENT HEALTHCARE!
Welcome back, geniuses and morons. Or as I like to say, people who agree with me and those who do not, respectively. I’m here to warn you about the death-warrant the “president” has written for all Americans in the form of government-sponsored healthcare. Now I’m aware that a few of you are still bogged down in the belief that such a thing would be good for America, because you heard some co-worker pothead from Potsdam or some other god-forsaken hell-hole of a European country say that their country’s government healthcare is the best in the world. But if this is the case, why do these people live here in the United States? And why do people from virtually every country with government healthcare end up selling their houses and all that they have so they can pay for American healthcare when they discover cancer or heart disease or some other life-threatening health concern? Answer: because universal healthcare is a scam that kills people.
Around 91% of Americans have health insurance, and around 84% of those people are satisfied with their coverage and the healthcare they receive by it. So to keep that huge chunk of people quiet, the extremely powerful and dangerous globalists that support the healthcare reform bill are utilizing every resource they have to convince those people that they will have the option to keep their current health insurance. But thanks to the miracle of video cameras, we have Barack Obama on tape saying that the only healthcare plan he could get behind is a single-payer system, meaning a system that is entirely government-controlled, and totally devoid of private insurance companies and private care providers. Obama’s propagandists are out in full force stating that these videos and quotes are simply being taken out of context. But the bill itself contains a provision for rendering all new private insurance policies illegal, and if you lose your private insurance, you would have to go on the government plan. So when the big B.O. said a couple of years ago that he expects a transition period of ten to twenty years before all Americans find themselves stuck with government healthcare, the only possible interpretation of that statement is that he meant it. His new bill confirms this.
The bill in question also provides for forced in-home vaccinations at the discretion of the government. In short, this means that the federal government can make any given vaccine mandatory for any given person, and then send government agents to your home to administer a “vaccine intervention” for the good of the community. I’m aware that some of you are functioning on little more than a brain stem, and to you zombies I’m sure this sounds too conspiracy-theorist to be credible, but to anyone with a moderate degree of historical knowledge it sets in motion a dangerous chain of events when you give a corrupt government the authority to inject anyone they want to with any chemicals they feel like.
And let's not forget about the age-priority structure upon which this plan is built. If anyone reading this is under the age of fourteen or over the age of forty, you might as well kill yourself now because if you get sick, forget about finding a doctor who will treat you. As the plan goes, anyone that falls outside of the priority window will only get left-over healthcare. And as anyone from Canada can tell you, there is no such thing as surplus healthcare in a universal system. Quite the contrary, there is never ENOUGH healthcare in a universal system. Oh well, sorry mom, the government says you're too old for those antibiotics. See you in hell.
Equally as alarming as the content of the bill itself is the speed at which its proponents are trying to ramrod it through to a vote. When pressed to answer why they don't know the contents of the bill, its supporters make the argument that the bill is more than one thousand pages long and it is unreasonable to expect that those who will be voting on the bill should actually take the time to read it! Then why in the hell do they want to vote on it so soon?! If you have an iota of common sense in that chickpea democrat brain of yours, this should immediately disturb you and make your blood boil. What are they hiding in the thousands of pages of this bill? With such inevitably serious ramifications, why is this issue being pushed at such a rapid rate? They don't want to allow enough time to read the bill because they know that if the bill is read in depth, the truly ugly nature of its content will be exposed, and their chance to force universal healthcare down your throat will be dead and buried forever. That is why they tell you to be satisfied with the official summary of the bill, and just don't worry your little head about the other 998 pages. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!
Well, with all that has been said on this issue, and with all that you can find for yourself, I will say no more about the bill itself. But how are the people actually responding to the prospect of DMV-style healthcare? Just take a look at any random “town hall” meeting being held across the new Soviet States of America and the scene you will see is one of desperate, vicious, fearful, indignant revolt. When the “president” sends his human-jackhammers out into the public to force a tunnel through the crowds so he can railroad his policies through to ratification, the once loud and arrogant con-artists find that there is no p.a. system loud enough to make their lies audible over the voice of the American people, and these hacks are trembling at the site of their political careers crashing to the ground.
But the “president” plays it cool, as always, labeling such legally-assembled protesters “mobs” and “manufactured astroturf.” When George W. Bush was in office and community-organizers like Barack Obama went about leading protests against the president, the media considered such gatherings to be patriotic assemblies; responsible citizens exercising their constitutional right to seek redress for their grievances. But when genuine, ordinary Americans seek out the proper venues wherein answers to logical questions should be found, the same media actively portrays such assemblies as nothing more than Republican shenanigans, even when the protesters have a majority of the American populace behind them, according to the most recent liberally-biased polls. In fact, the media has become so corrupt and unreliable that when ten thousand people attended a rally in Columbus Ohio to peacefully protest the “president’s” policies, the few media outlets that covered the event reported a maximum of three hundred people present.
So a little more than half-a-year into this administration’s first term, and the United States is in real danger of no longer existing as a republic. If nearly all of us oppose an unconstitutional policy and it gets shoved through anyway, how can we call our country a republic? If the majority of us who oppose government healthcare are ignored and this communist “president” gets his way, I don’t want to hear any regrets or complaints out of you few remaining idiots who still support Obama and his band of Chicago mobsters when the government denies your application for life-saving surgery. To me, the refusal of life support to millions of retards will be the only good thing to come out of all of this.
Around 91% of Americans have health insurance, and around 84% of those people are satisfied with their coverage and the healthcare they receive by it. So to keep that huge chunk of people quiet, the extremely powerful and dangerous globalists that support the healthcare reform bill are utilizing every resource they have to convince those people that they will have the option to keep their current health insurance. But thanks to the miracle of video cameras, we have Barack Obama on tape saying that the only healthcare plan he could get behind is a single-payer system, meaning a system that is entirely government-controlled, and totally devoid of private insurance companies and private care providers. Obama’s propagandists are out in full force stating that these videos and quotes are simply being taken out of context. But the bill itself contains a provision for rendering all new private insurance policies illegal, and if you lose your private insurance, you would have to go on the government plan. So when the big B.O. said a couple of years ago that he expects a transition period of ten to twenty years before all Americans find themselves stuck with government healthcare, the only possible interpretation of that statement is that he meant it. His new bill confirms this.
The bill in question also provides for forced in-home vaccinations at the discretion of the government. In short, this means that the federal government can make any given vaccine mandatory for any given person, and then send government agents to your home to administer a “vaccine intervention” for the good of the community. I’m aware that some of you are functioning on little more than a brain stem, and to you zombies I’m sure this sounds too conspiracy-theorist to be credible, but to anyone with a moderate degree of historical knowledge it sets in motion a dangerous chain of events when you give a corrupt government the authority to inject anyone they want to with any chemicals they feel like.
And let's not forget about the age-priority structure upon which this plan is built. If anyone reading this is under the age of fourteen or over the age of forty, you might as well kill yourself now because if you get sick, forget about finding a doctor who will treat you. As the plan goes, anyone that falls outside of the priority window will only get left-over healthcare. And as anyone from Canada can tell you, there is no such thing as surplus healthcare in a universal system. Quite the contrary, there is never ENOUGH healthcare in a universal system. Oh well, sorry mom, the government says you're too old for those antibiotics. See you in hell.
Equally as alarming as the content of the bill itself is the speed at which its proponents are trying to ramrod it through to a vote. When pressed to answer why they don't know the contents of the bill, its supporters make the argument that the bill is more than one thousand pages long and it is unreasonable to expect that those who will be voting on the bill should actually take the time to read it! Then why in the hell do they want to vote on it so soon?! If you have an iota of common sense in that chickpea democrat brain of yours, this should immediately disturb you and make your blood boil. What are they hiding in the thousands of pages of this bill? With such inevitably serious ramifications, why is this issue being pushed at such a rapid rate? They don't want to allow enough time to read the bill because they know that if the bill is read in depth, the truly ugly nature of its content will be exposed, and their chance to force universal healthcare down your throat will be dead and buried forever. That is why they tell you to be satisfied with the official summary of the bill, and just don't worry your little head about the other 998 pages. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!
Well, with all that has been said on this issue, and with all that you can find for yourself, I will say no more about the bill itself. But how are the people actually responding to the prospect of DMV-style healthcare? Just take a look at any random “town hall” meeting being held across the new Soviet States of America and the scene you will see is one of desperate, vicious, fearful, indignant revolt. When the “president” sends his human-jackhammers out into the public to force a tunnel through the crowds so he can railroad his policies through to ratification, the once loud and arrogant con-artists find that there is no p.a. system loud enough to make their lies audible over the voice of the American people, and these hacks are trembling at the site of their political careers crashing to the ground.
But the “president” plays it cool, as always, labeling such legally-assembled protesters “mobs” and “manufactured astroturf.” When George W. Bush was in office and community-organizers like Barack Obama went about leading protests against the president, the media considered such gatherings to be patriotic assemblies; responsible citizens exercising their constitutional right to seek redress for their grievances. But when genuine, ordinary Americans seek out the proper venues wherein answers to logical questions should be found, the same media actively portrays such assemblies as nothing more than Republican shenanigans, even when the protesters have a majority of the American populace behind them, according to the most recent liberally-biased polls. In fact, the media has become so corrupt and unreliable that when ten thousand people attended a rally in Columbus Ohio to peacefully protest the “president’s” policies, the few media outlets that covered the event reported a maximum of three hundred people present.
So a little more than half-a-year into this administration’s first term, and the United States is in real danger of no longer existing as a republic. If nearly all of us oppose an unconstitutional policy and it gets shoved through anyway, how can we call our country a republic? If the majority of us who oppose government healthcare are ignored and this communist “president” gets his way, I don’t want to hear any regrets or complaints out of you few remaining idiots who still support Obama and his band of Chicago mobsters when the government denies your application for life-saving surgery. To me, the refusal of life support to millions of retards will be the only good thing to come out of all of this.
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
THE COLOR OF HOPE IS MULATTO, THE VOICE OF CHANGE IS BLACK
The beauty of all human life is freedom. You may call it moral agency, liberty, or self-governance. However you refer to it, freedom is the very foundation of happiness, and it is the only word that can truly capture the beautiful essence of the United States of America without the aid of any other descriptive terms. With the last presidential “election,” we saw the word “freedom” thrown out and replaced with another, much more dubious one: hope.
It was said of Barrack Hussein Obama that he was the option of “hope.” Here I would like to pose a question. What were you hoping for when you voted for Barrack Obama? Since most people who voted for B.O. are either mentally-disabled or just lazy and selectively ignorant, I don’t expect any honest answers to that question. Instead, allow me to show you that whatever you hoped to get in return for putting the son of lies in the highest office in the world, you will never see those hopes materialize.
If you hoped that Obama would help you out at the expense of some rich fat cat, think again. Obama is the key that turns the corrupt Chicago political machine. Any dividends he is able to scrape together by soaking the rich will be granted to his friends in the government. Poor hacks like you will continue to scratch your living out of the ground.
Or perhaps you hoped that by an Obama victory your freedoms would be expanded. Take a moment to ask yourself if your liberties are safer now than they were before Obama took office. I know it’s difficult to actually think about something other than celebrities dying and which website you’ll be surfing next, but really try to confront this one with all the power your little smut-filled brain can muster. And if it’s too hard for you to dig down and drag out the ugly head of reality, let me do it for you.
The Constitution is a document intended to preserve the freedom of Americans. Without freedom, how can one really pursue happiness? The goal of the government is to uphold the Constitution and defend the peoples’ ability to enjoy its provisions. Effectively, the goal of the government is to limit the number of obstacles it puts in the path of ordinary citizens as they pursue happiness. But has our new chairman done that? Has he kept his oath? Read on and decide for yourself.
B.O. has taken over the banks, credit companies, and virtually all financial institutions. He has taken over the auto and housing industries, which basically form the spine of our national economy. Now Barry is posturing to take over the industries of energy and healthcare, thereby further depleting the options and bank accounts of ALL Americans, while INCREASING our dependency on the government. Every week a new government agency is born, a dozen new czars are appointed, and another news company becomes a 24-hour propaganda distributor for Obama.
So if you want proof that the community-organizer-in-chief Obama is a liar who misrepresents himself and can't be trusted, think about this: Obama told us he didn't want to control the auto industry, yet he now controls it. He said he didn't want to control the banks, yet he controls them too. When certain banks that received bail-out money tried to pay the government back, Obama refused to let that happen. Why? So he could maintain his control over them. He said he would eliminate the national debt within his first term, yet his policies increase the debt by more than a billion dollars each hour. He convinced the poor, degenerate fools who voted for him that he would make their lives easier and more affordable, yet he is fighting to push an energy bill that he himself claims will multiply the cost of energy ten times over for the average household. And if his national healthcare plan gets the green light the average American will see their taxes increase by as much as five percent, all so some worthless illegal alien can feel like he's getting good healthcare for nothing, when in reality everyone with half a brain knows that government-run healthcare is a joke and it is a system that is failing around the world, along with the health of those who rely on it. These things all point to the greatest, most glaring lie of all, which comes in the form of Obama claiming that he's not a communist.
Now you might say that these things are all the actions of the government as a whole, and Obama can’t be held accountable for them. Not so. Obama IS the government. My friends and enemies, Barrack Obama has been given such a mighty sledgehammer of support by nearly all of the various agents of the government, he might as well just declare himself the very embodiment of all three branches of the government. He is at the top of this pyramid scheme, and as such he is the pharaoh of the USA. Knowing this, can you honestly say that you are freer now than you were last year? I think not.
So if you hoped to find liberty in liberalism, you’ve been duped. You have voted and/or silenced yourself into submission. And what stings the most is that you probably didn’t really know what you wanted or hoped for when you decided to support Obama. You simply LIKE him. You are infatuated with his face, his voice, his ambiguous mottos, and his hip style. And now, less than half a year into the most un-American presidency America has ever seen, as we approach the birthday of our great nation, we find our freedoms in shackles. Our mother Liberty is bound, blindfolded, and she is being taken advantage of. And if you want to know who allowed this to happen, look to the ignorant masses, the street bums looking for handouts, the illegal aliens voting with no right to do so, Acorn, and perhaps in a mirror.
When you decided that you liked Obama, you thought you were supporting a charismatic black man who spoke truth and optimism. What you got was a walking contradiction. A half-white, dishonest doomsayer, with a voice as black as the death of freedom. A vicious, repugnant, bitter enemy to America. With men like that controlling her affairs, she may starve to death before she sees her next birthday. So next time you vote for “hope,” make sure you know what the word means. Because what one man hopes for, Lady Liberty dreads.
It was said of Barrack Hussein Obama that he was the option of “hope.” Here I would like to pose a question. What were you hoping for when you voted for Barrack Obama? Since most people who voted for B.O. are either mentally-disabled or just lazy and selectively ignorant, I don’t expect any honest answers to that question. Instead, allow me to show you that whatever you hoped to get in return for putting the son of lies in the highest office in the world, you will never see those hopes materialize.
If you hoped that Obama would help you out at the expense of some rich fat cat, think again. Obama is the key that turns the corrupt Chicago political machine. Any dividends he is able to scrape together by soaking the rich will be granted to his friends in the government. Poor hacks like you will continue to scratch your living out of the ground.
Or perhaps you hoped that by an Obama victory your freedoms would be expanded. Take a moment to ask yourself if your liberties are safer now than they were before Obama took office. I know it’s difficult to actually think about something other than celebrities dying and which website you’ll be surfing next, but really try to confront this one with all the power your little smut-filled brain can muster. And if it’s too hard for you to dig down and drag out the ugly head of reality, let me do it for you.
The Constitution is a document intended to preserve the freedom of Americans. Without freedom, how can one really pursue happiness? The goal of the government is to uphold the Constitution and defend the peoples’ ability to enjoy its provisions. Effectively, the goal of the government is to limit the number of obstacles it puts in the path of ordinary citizens as they pursue happiness. But has our new chairman done that? Has he kept his oath? Read on and decide for yourself.
B.O. has taken over the banks, credit companies, and virtually all financial institutions. He has taken over the auto and housing industries, which basically form the spine of our national economy. Now Barry is posturing to take over the industries of energy and healthcare, thereby further depleting the options and bank accounts of ALL Americans, while INCREASING our dependency on the government. Every week a new government agency is born, a dozen new czars are appointed, and another news company becomes a 24-hour propaganda distributor for Obama.
So if you want proof that the community-organizer-in-chief Obama is a liar who misrepresents himself and can't be trusted, think about this: Obama told us he didn't want to control the auto industry, yet he now controls it. He said he didn't want to control the banks, yet he controls them too. When certain banks that received bail-out money tried to pay the government back, Obama refused to let that happen. Why? So he could maintain his control over them. He said he would eliminate the national debt within his first term, yet his policies increase the debt by more than a billion dollars each hour. He convinced the poor, degenerate fools who voted for him that he would make their lives easier and more affordable, yet he is fighting to push an energy bill that he himself claims will multiply the cost of energy ten times over for the average household. And if his national healthcare plan gets the green light the average American will see their taxes increase by as much as five percent, all so some worthless illegal alien can feel like he's getting good healthcare for nothing, when in reality everyone with half a brain knows that government-run healthcare is a joke and it is a system that is failing around the world, along with the health of those who rely on it. These things all point to the greatest, most glaring lie of all, which comes in the form of Obama claiming that he's not a communist.
Now you might say that these things are all the actions of the government as a whole, and Obama can’t be held accountable for them. Not so. Obama IS the government. My friends and enemies, Barrack Obama has been given such a mighty sledgehammer of support by nearly all of the various agents of the government, he might as well just declare himself the very embodiment of all three branches of the government. He is at the top of this pyramid scheme, and as such he is the pharaoh of the USA. Knowing this, can you honestly say that you are freer now than you were last year? I think not.
So if you hoped to find liberty in liberalism, you’ve been duped. You have voted and/or silenced yourself into submission. And what stings the most is that you probably didn’t really know what you wanted or hoped for when you decided to support Obama. You simply LIKE him. You are infatuated with his face, his voice, his ambiguous mottos, and his hip style. And now, less than half a year into the most un-American presidency America has ever seen, as we approach the birthday of our great nation, we find our freedoms in shackles. Our mother Liberty is bound, blindfolded, and she is being taken advantage of. And if you want to know who allowed this to happen, look to the ignorant masses, the street bums looking for handouts, the illegal aliens voting with no right to do so, Acorn, and perhaps in a mirror.
When you decided that you liked Obama, you thought you were supporting a charismatic black man who spoke truth and optimism. What you got was a walking contradiction. A half-white, dishonest doomsayer, with a voice as black as the death of freedom. A vicious, repugnant, bitter enemy to America. With men like that controlling her affairs, she may starve to death before she sees her next birthday. So next time you vote for “hope,” make sure you know what the word means. Because what one man hopes for, Lady Liberty dreads.
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
Red, White, and Bruised (part three): Racism Shmacism
There are many weapons being used at this time to undermine the strength of America. Attacks on religion, political-correctness, moral re-education, just to name a few. But there is another very effective tool being used to weaken this Country, which is much more obvious than most of the others. It is reverse-racism. Here’s the point. By convincing white Americans that they are racist just by existing as white Americans and demoting them to second-rate citizens because of the things white people have done in the past, the anti-American hellhounds have successfully drained every ounce of confidence and strength from the largest race in the country, and thusly the country itself.
Before I continue, I have a confession to make. I am white. Pure, pristine, white as the driven snow. And because of my race alone, I have been called a racist not only by black peers, but by brain-washed self-loathing whites as well. I have been discriminated against specifically because I am white. And yet, not once in my life have I said or done anything even remotely discriminatory to a minority. You are perhaps wondering why I feel a need to divulge this. I do so because I believe this is the case for most white Americans. While whites try harder and harder to prove to minorities that they approve of their citizenship in this country, the clamor against them gets louder and more violent. And since the majority of that noise comes from black Americans, I will write mainly about them.
Since some of you reading this would probably feel too guilty in thinking about black racism towards whites, I’ll warm you up by providing you with examples. Will Smith is perhaps the most prominent black person in entertainment today, next to the comedian/actor Barack Obama. Smith, who openly campaigned for George W. Bush in 2004, recently went on a black pride rampage in response to the election of president Barack Obama. The big Willy went on the Oprah Winfrey show and, during a meteoric descent into insanity not seen on television since Tom Cruise announced his love for Katie Holmes on the same show, cried openly and screamed and met his day’s cardio-exercise goals on Oprah’s stage because a black person had finally won the US presidency. But wait, that’s not racism! He’s just celebrating! Right? Wrong.
Reverse the roles. Imagine that, upon the election of another white president, a white person went on a press junket in celebration of the victory, not because of their politics, but because they liked the president’s skin color. Would that person receive cheers and applause like Will Smith received for his inane behavior on the Oprah show? Hardly. He or she would be declared a bigot, they would be called every libelous name in the human vocabulary, and their reputation would be ruined. But for Will Smith and all other blacks, a totally separate set of rules applies. Smith goes on to take further advantage of this discrepancy in racial standards by saying that Obama “has validated something that I've believed for a lot of years, that I've never really been able to say. People looked at me crazy, and as a black man you were never really allowed to say: You know, I don't think America is a racist nation. I think there are racist people that live here, but I think as a whole America is not a racist nation.You were Uncle Tom if you ever said that before. ... I think [his election] completed a cycle of African-American citizenship. It was like the last stamp on African-American citizenship, and no longer are we African-Americans. We are Americans of African descent.”
So even though blacks were emancipated over 140 years ago by the deaths of millions of white people, and even though millions of white people came to the defense of blacks during the process of desegregation more than forty years ago to further declare blacks as citizens, and even though some of the most powerful people in the government over the last twenty years have been black men and women, black citizenship wasn’t really official until a half-white/ half-Luo man became president. That is basically what will smith is saying. If this doesn’t strike you as racist, you are probably just high.
In his book “Dreams of my Father,” Barack Obama, himself half white, had this to say about his life amongst white people: “ We were always playing on the white man’s court…by the white man’s rules…any distinction between good and bad whites held negligible meaning… our rage at the white world needed no object.., no independent confirmation.” Barack Obama was raised partly in Indonesia and mostly in Hawaii. I wonder just how much racism he encountered growing up. In apparent disgust over his white heritage, Obama writes “ I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of twelve or thirteen… as I imagined myself following Malcom’s call, one line in [Malcom X’s] book stayed with me. He spoke of a wish he’d once had… that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged.” He then categorizes white people as “some cruel, some ignorant.” As if to explain his reason for making racist statements, Obama states that “race-bating could make up for a host of limitations” in the political world.
Please smack me in the face so that I can wake up from this nightmare of a world I am living in.
Now if you’re wondering where this is all going, or how it could end up even affecting you, consider the TKO super-combo of racism AND sexism known as Sonia Sotomayor. She has been nominated to the United States Supreme Court and will doubtless be approved as our newest justice. In one balls-to-the-walls, no-holds-barred, put up your dukes, eat my shorts statement, this bigoted old hack has managed to make official something that most people have sensed for a long time: whitey is going down. She did this by saying “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life”
If you think I’m just blowing hot air, take a look at her record. This is a judge whose rulings in the court of appeals have been overturned by the Supreme Court more than sixty percent of the time because her bias has led her to make extra-legal decisions. Even more disturbing is the fact that Sotomayor is a member of La Raza (meaning "the race"), a latino-pride orginization who advocates for amnesty for illegal aliens, and states their main objective to be the return of the western United States to Mexican authority and kicking out all non-Aztecas. Barack Obama campaigned on the promise that he would nominate judges who would rule in favor of minorities specifically because of their race, and conversely, judges who would rule against whites because of their race. He has now put his money where his teleprompter is. We have reached a point in our history where our government has loudly proclaimed itself unable to dispense blind justice. If the highest court in the land and the highest office in the land can’t be trusted to interpret the law in a manner that honors the constitution, what can they be trusted with?
As I’ve said before, right and wrong have simply traded places. Other than that, there has been no change. Racism against whites is just as racist as racism BY whites. But those with the means have been so successful in mixing up the race cards that they’ve actually convinced white Americans that they deserve to be punished for the crimes of a few long-dead white people. I for one will not be apologizing to minorities as they march me to the gas chamber.
Before I continue, I have a confession to make. I am white. Pure, pristine, white as the driven snow. And because of my race alone, I have been called a racist not only by black peers, but by brain-washed self-loathing whites as well. I have been discriminated against specifically because I am white. And yet, not once in my life have I said or done anything even remotely discriminatory to a minority. You are perhaps wondering why I feel a need to divulge this. I do so because I believe this is the case for most white Americans. While whites try harder and harder to prove to minorities that they approve of their citizenship in this country, the clamor against them gets louder and more violent. And since the majority of that noise comes from black Americans, I will write mainly about them.
Since some of you reading this would probably feel too guilty in thinking about black racism towards whites, I’ll warm you up by providing you with examples. Will Smith is perhaps the most prominent black person in entertainment today, next to the comedian/actor Barack Obama. Smith, who openly campaigned for George W. Bush in 2004, recently went on a black pride rampage in response to the election of president Barack Obama. The big Willy went on the Oprah Winfrey show and, during a meteoric descent into insanity not seen on television since Tom Cruise announced his love for Katie Holmes on the same show, cried openly and screamed and met his day’s cardio-exercise goals on Oprah’s stage because a black person had finally won the US presidency. But wait, that’s not racism! He’s just celebrating! Right? Wrong.
Reverse the roles. Imagine that, upon the election of another white president, a white person went on a press junket in celebration of the victory, not because of their politics, but because they liked the president’s skin color. Would that person receive cheers and applause like Will Smith received for his inane behavior on the Oprah show? Hardly. He or she would be declared a bigot, they would be called every libelous name in the human vocabulary, and their reputation would be ruined. But for Will Smith and all other blacks, a totally separate set of rules applies. Smith goes on to take further advantage of this discrepancy in racial standards by saying that Obama “has validated something that I've believed for a lot of years, that I've never really been able to say. People looked at me crazy, and as a black man you were never really allowed to say: You know, I don't think America is a racist nation. I think there are racist people that live here, but I think as a whole America is not a racist nation.You were Uncle Tom if you ever said that before. ... I think [his election] completed a cycle of African-American citizenship. It was like the last stamp on African-American citizenship, and no longer are we African-Americans. We are Americans of African descent.”
So even though blacks were emancipated over 140 years ago by the deaths of millions of white people, and even though millions of white people came to the defense of blacks during the process of desegregation more than forty years ago to further declare blacks as citizens, and even though some of the most powerful people in the government over the last twenty years have been black men and women, black citizenship wasn’t really official until a half-white/ half-Luo man became president. That is basically what will smith is saying. If this doesn’t strike you as racist, you are probably just high.
In his book “Dreams of my Father,” Barack Obama, himself half white, had this to say about his life amongst white people: “ We were always playing on the white man’s court…by the white man’s rules…any distinction between good and bad whites held negligible meaning… our rage at the white world needed no object.., no independent confirmation.” Barack Obama was raised partly in Indonesia and mostly in Hawaii. I wonder just how much racism he encountered growing up. In apparent disgust over his white heritage, Obama writes “ I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of twelve or thirteen… as I imagined myself following Malcom’s call, one line in [Malcom X’s] book stayed with me. He spoke of a wish he’d once had… that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged.” He then categorizes white people as “some cruel, some ignorant.” As if to explain his reason for making racist statements, Obama states that “race-bating could make up for a host of limitations” in the political world.
Please smack me in the face so that I can wake up from this nightmare of a world I am living in.
Now if you’re wondering where this is all going, or how it could end up even affecting you, consider the TKO super-combo of racism AND sexism known as Sonia Sotomayor. She has been nominated to the United States Supreme Court and will doubtless be approved as our newest justice. In one balls-to-the-walls, no-holds-barred, put up your dukes, eat my shorts statement, this bigoted old hack has managed to make official something that most people have sensed for a long time: whitey is going down. She did this by saying “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life”
If you think I’m just blowing hot air, take a look at her record. This is a judge whose rulings in the court of appeals have been overturned by the Supreme Court more than sixty percent of the time because her bias has led her to make extra-legal decisions. Even more disturbing is the fact that Sotomayor is a member of La Raza (meaning "the race"), a latino-pride orginization who advocates for amnesty for illegal aliens, and states their main objective to be the return of the western United States to Mexican authority and kicking out all non-Aztecas. Barack Obama campaigned on the promise that he would nominate judges who would rule in favor of minorities specifically because of their race, and conversely, judges who would rule against whites because of their race. He has now put his money where his teleprompter is. We have reached a point in our history where our government has loudly proclaimed itself unable to dispense blind justice. If the highest court in the land and the highest office in the land can’t be trusted to interpret the law in a manner that honors the constitution, what can they be trusted with?
As I’ve said before, right and wrong have simply traded places. Other than that, there has been no change. Racism against whites is just as racist as racism BY whites. But those with the means have been so successful in mixing up the race cards that they’ve actually convinced white Americans that they deserve to be punished for the crimes of a few long-dead white people. I for one will not be apologizing to minorities as they march me to the gas chamber.
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
INTERLUDE
It has come to my attention that, after just two posts and an inconsequential number of readers, almost half of you are struggling with the material in this blog. You can not see the connections between the things in my writings. You don’t understand how they are linked. I will explain this once. This blog and the “Red, White, and Bruised” series are about America and all things wrong with it. If this simple premise is too mind-boggling and you really can’t draw the connections, or if it takes too much work to read multiple paragraphs at one time, or if you truly don’t have the mental energy it takes to do a little research to discover for yourself that the statements in these writings are not subjective opinions but facts, then perhaps http://www.sesamestreet.org/home would be more appropriate for your intellectual capacity.
This blog is for people who love America and are willing to at least put in the book time required to justify the way they vote and think. It is for people who treasure the US Constitution in their hearts, and understand that even the most remotely socialistic of policies is in direct conflict with the liberties outlined in the foundational laws of this great nation. This blog is for people who prefer to do their own thinking, rather than contracting out their thinking to regional trend-setters. This blog is for people who don’t turn off the news
Before I post any further writings, I ask that you take a few days to read the Constitution, with special consideration for the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence and actually try to think about what these articles mean to you. You must grasp these elementary pre-reqs before you can even begin to understand the dangers to the nation which I will outline in writings to come. And if this simple assignment takes too much effort on your part, forget it. This blog is not for you. Go back to your reality tv shows, your Daily Show, your NPR. Don’t trouble yourself with the truth. Let those who genuinely care about freedom do the heavy lifting required to maintain such. In fact, if you are one of the millions of thoughtless, spoiled, lazy American ingrates who have allowed themselves to be brainwashed into thinking that socialism has a place in America, take a hike to Canada and stay there. This COUNTRY is not for you.
This blog is for people who love America and are willing to at least put in the book time required to justify the way they vote and think. It is for people who treasure the US Constitution in their hearts, and understand that even the most remotely socialistic of policies is in direct conflict with the liberties outlined in the foundational laws of this great nation. This blog is for people who prefer to do their own thinking, rather than contracting out their thinking to regional trend-setters. This blog is for people who don’t turn off the news
Before I post any further writings, I ask that you take a few days to read the Constitution, with special consideration for the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence and actually try to think about what these articles mean to you. You must grasp these elementary pre-reqs before you can even begin to understand the dangers to the nation which I will outline in writings to come. And if this simple assignment takes too much effort on your part, forget it. This blog is not for you. Go back to your reality tv shows, your Daily Show, your NPR. Don’t trouble yourself with the truth. Let those who genuinely care about freedom do the heavy lifting required to maintain such. In fact, if you are one of the millions of thoughtless, spoiled, lazy American ingrates who have allowed themselves to be brainwashed into thinking that socialism has a place in America, take a hike to Canada and stay there. This COUNTRY is not for you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
