The beauty of all human life is freedom. You may call it moral agency, liberty, or self-governance. However you refer to it, freedom is the very foundation of happiness, and it is the only word that can truly capture the beautiful essence of the United States of America without the aid of any other descriptive terms. With the last presidential “election,” we saw the word “freedom” thrown out and replaced with another, much more dubious one: hope.
It was said of Barrack Hussein Obama that he was the option of “hope.” Here I would like to pose a question. What were you hoping for when you voted for Barrack Obama? Since most people who voted for B.O. are either mentally-disabled or just lazy and selectively ignorant, I don’t expect any honest answers to that question. Instead, allow me to show you that whatever you hoped to get in return for putting the son of lies in the highest office in the world, you will never see those hopes materialize.
If you hoped that Obama would help you out at the expense of some rich fat cat, think again. Obama is the key that turns the corrupt Chicago political machine. Any dividends he is able to scrape together by soaking the rich will be granted to his friends in the government. Poor hacks like you will continue to scratch your living out of the ground.
Or perhaps you hoped that by an Obama victory your freedoms would be expanded. Take a moment to ask yourself if your liberties are safer now than they were before Obama took office. I know it’s difficult to actually think about something other than celebrities dying and which website you’ll be surfing next, but really try to confront this one with all the power your little smut-filled brain can muster. And if it’s too hard for you to dig down and drag out the ugly head of reality, let me do it for you.
The Constitution is a document intended to preserve the freedom of Americans. Without freedom, how can one really pursue happiness? The goal of the government is to uphold the Constitution and defend the peoples’ ability to enjoy its provisions. Effectively, the goal of the government is to limit the number of obstacles it puts in the path of ordinary citizens as they pursue happiness. But has our new chairman done that? Has he kept his oath? Read on and decide for yourself.
B.O. has taken over the banks, credit companies, and virtually all financial institutions. He has taken over the auto and housing industries, which basically form the spine of our national economy. Now Barry is posturing to take over the industries of energy and healthcare, thereby further depleting the options and bank accounts of ALL Americans, while INCREASING our dependency on the government. Every week a new government agency is born, a dozen new czars are appointed, and another news company becomes a 24-hour propaganda distributor for Obama.
So if you want proof that the community-organizer-in-chief Obama is a liar who misrepresents himself and can't be trusted, think about this: Obama told us he didn't want to control the auto industry, yet he now controls it. He said he didn't want to control the banks, yet he controls them too. When certain banks that received bail-out money tried to pay the government back, Obama refused to let that happen. Why? So he could maintain his control over them. He said he would eliminate the national debt within his first term, yet his policies increase the debt by more than a billion dollars each hour. He convinced the poor, degenerate fools who voted for him that he would make their lives easier and more affordable, yet he is fighting to push an energy bill that he himself claims will multiply the cost of energy ten times over for the average household. And if his national healthcare plan gets the green light the average American will see their taxes increase by as much as five percent, all so some worthless illegal alien can feel like he's getting good healthcare for nothing, when in reality everyone with half a brain knows that government-run healthcare is a joke and it is a system that is failing around the world, along with the health of those who rely on it. These things all point to the greatest, most glaring lie of all, which comes in the form of Obama claiming that he's not a communist.
Now you might say that these things are all the actions of the government as a whole, and Obama can’t be held accountable for them. Not so. Obama IS the government. My friends and enemies, Barrack Obama has been given such a mighty sledgehammer of support by nearly all of the various agents of the government, he might as well just declare himself the very embodiment of all three branches of the government. He is at the top of this pyramid scheme, and as such he is the pharaoh of the USA. Knowing this, can you honestly say that you are freer now than you were last year? I think not.
So if you hoped to find liberty in liberalism, you’ve been duped. You have voted and/or silenced yourself into submission. And what stings the most is that you probably didn’t really know what you wanted or hoped for when you decided to support Obama. You simply LIKE him. You are infatuated with his face, his voice, his ambiguous mottos, and his hip style. And now, less than half a year into the most un-American presidency America has ever seen, as we approach the birthday of our great nation, we find our freedoms in shackles. Our mother Liberty is bound, blindfolded, and she is being taken advantage of. And if you want to know who allowed this to happen, look to the ignorant masses, the street bums looking for handouts, the illegal aliens voting with no right to do so, Acorn, and perhaps in a mirror.
When you decided that you liked Obama, you thought you were supporting a charismatic black man who spoke truth and optimism. What you got was a walking contradiction. A half-white, dishonest doomsayer, with a voice as black as the death of freedom. A vicious, repugnant, bitter enemy to America. With men like that controlling her affairs, she may starve to death before she sees her next birthday. So next time you vote for “hope,” make sure you know what the word means. Because what one man hopes for, Lady Liberty dreads.
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
Red, White, and Bruised (part three): Racism Shmacism
There are many weapons being used at this time to undermine the strength of America. Attacks on religion, political-correctness, moral re-education, just to name a few. But there is another very effective tool being used to weaken this Country, which is much more obvious than most of the others. It is reverse-racism. Here’s the point. By convincing white Americans that they are racist just by existing as white Americans and demoting them to second-rate citizens because of the things white people have done in the past, the anti-American hellhounds have successfully drained every ounce of confidence and strength from the largest race in the country, and thusly the country itself.
Before I continue, I have a confession to make. I am white. Pure, pristine, white as the driven snow. And because of my race alone, I have been called a racist not only by black peers, but by brain-washed self-loathing whites as well. I have been discriminated against specifically because I am white. And yet, not once in my life have I said or done anything even remotely discriminatory to a minority. You are perhaps wondering why I feel a need to divulge this. I do so because I believe this is the case for most white Americans. While whites try harder and harder to prove to minorities that they approve of their citizenship in this country, the clamor against them gets louder and more violent. And since the majority of that noise comes from black Americans, I will write mainly about them.
Since some of you reading this would probably feel too guilty in thinking about black racism towards whites, I’ll warm you up by providing you with examples. Will Smith is perhaps the most prominent black person in entertainment today, next to the comedian/actor Barack Obama. Smith, who openly campaigned for George W. Bush in 2004, recently went on a black pride rampage in response to the election of president Barack Obama. The big Willy went on the Oprah Winfrey show and, during a meteoric descent into insanity not seen on television since Tom Cruise announced his love for Katie Holmes on the same show, cried openly and screamed and met his day’s cardio-exercise goals on Oprah’s stage because a black person had finally won the US presidency. But wait, that’s not racism! He’s just celebrating! Right? Wrong.
Reverse the roles. Imagine that, upon the election of another white president, a white person went on a press junket in celebration of the victory, not because of their politics, but because they liked the president’s skin color. Would that person receive cheers and applause like Will Smith received for his inane behavior on the Oprah show? Hardly. He or she would be declared a bigot, they would be called every libelous name in the human vocabulary, and their reputation would be ruined. But for Will Smith and all other blacks, a totally separate set of rules applies. Smith goes on to take further advantage of this discrepancy in racial standards by saying that Obama “has validated something that I've believed for a lot of years, that I've never really been able to say. People looked at me crazy, and as a black man you were never really allowed to say: You know, I don't think America is a racist nation. I think there are racist people that live here, but I think as a whole America is not a racist nation.You were Uncle Tom if you ever said that before. ... I think [his election] completed a cycle of African-American citizenship. It was like the last stamp on African-American citizenship, and no longer are we African-Americans. We are Americans of African descent.”
So even though blacks were emancipated over 140 years ago by the deaths of millions of white people, and even though millions of white people came to the defense of blacks during the process of desegregation more than forty years ago to further declare blacks as citizens, and even though some of the most powerful people in the government over the last twenty years have been black men and women, black citizenship wasn’t really official until a half-white/ half-Luo man became president. That is basically what will smith is saying. If this doesn’t strike you as racist, you are probably just high.
In his book “Dreams of my Father,” Barack Obama, himself half white, had this to say about his life amongst white people: “ We were always playing on the white man’s court…by the white man’s rules…any distinction between good and bad whites held negligible meaning… our rage at the white world needed no object.., no independent confirmation.” Barack Obama was raised partly in Indonesia and mostly in Hawaii. I wonder just how much racism he encountered growing up. In apparent disgust over his white heritage, Obama writes “ I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of twelve or thirteen… as I imagined myself following Malcom’s call, one line in [Malcom X’s] book stayed with me. He spoke of a wish he’d once had… that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged.” He then categorizes white people as “some cruel, some ignorant.” As if to explain his reason for making racist statements, Obama states that “race-bating could make up for a host of limitations” in the political world.
Please smack me in the face so that I can wake up from this nightmare of a world I am living in.
Now if you’re wondering where this is all going, or how it could end up even affecting you, consider the TKO super-combo of racism AND sexism known as Sonia Sotomayor. She has been nominated to the United States Supreme Court and will doubtless be approved as our newest justice. In one balls-to-the-walls, no-holds-barred, put up your dukes, eat my shorts statement, this bigoted old hack has managed to make official something that most people have sensed for a long time: whitey is going down. She did this by saying “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life”
If you think I’m just blowing hot air, take a look at her record. This is a judge whose rulings in the court of appeals have been overturned by the Supreme Court more than sixty percent of the time because her bias has led her to make extra-legal decisions. Even more disturbing is the fact that Sotomayor is a member of La Raza (meaning "the race"), a latino-pride orginization who advocates for amnesty for illegal aliens, and states their main objective to be the return of the western United States to Mexican authority and kicking out all non-Aztecas. Barack Obama campaigned on the promise that he would nominate judges who would rule in favor of minorities specifically because of their race, and conversely, judges who would rule against whites because of their race. He has now put his money where his teleprompter is. We have reached a point in our history where our government has loudly proclaimed itself unable to dispense blind justice. If the highest court in the land and the highest office in the land can’t be trusted to interpret the law in a manner that honors the constitution, what can they be trusted with?
As I’ve said before, right and wrong have simply traded places. Other than that, there has been no change. Racism against whites is just as racist as racism BY whites. But those with the means have been so successful in mixing up the race cards that they’ve actually convinced white Americans that they deserve to be punished for the crimes of a few long-dead white people. I for one will not be apologizing to minorities as they march me to the gas chamber.
Before I continue, I have a confession to make. I am white. Pure, pristine, white as the driven snow. And because of my race alone, I have been called a racist not only by black peers, but by brain-washed self-loathing whites as well. I have been discriminated against specifically because I am white. And yet, not once in my life have I said or done anything even remotely discriminatory to a minority. You are perhaps wondering why I feel a need to divulge this. I do so because I believe this is the case for most white Americans. While whites try harder and harder to prove to minorities that they approve of their citizenship in this country, the clamor against them gets louder and more violent. And since the majority of that noise comes from black Americans, I will write mainly about them.
Since some of you reading this would probably feel too guilty in thinking about black racism towards whites, I’ll warm you up by providing you with examples. Will Smith is perhaps the most prominent black person in entertainment today, next to the comedian/actor Barack Obama. Smith, who openly campaigned for George W. Bush in 2004, recently went on a black pride rampage in response to the election of president Barack Obama. The big Willy went on the Oprah Winfrey show and, during a meteoric descent into insanity not seen on television since Tom Cruise announced his love for Katie Holmes on the same show, cried openly and screamed and met his day’s cardio-exercise goals on Oprah’s stage because a black person had finally won the US presidency. But wait, that’s not racism! He’s just celebrating! Right? Wrong.
Reverse the roles. Imagine that, upon the election of another white president, a white person went on a press junket in celebration of the victory, not because of their politics, but because they liked the president’s skin color. Would that person receive cheers and applause like Will Smith received for his inane behavior on the Oprah show? Hardly. He or she would be declared a bigot, they would be called every libelous name in the human vocabulary, and their reputation would be ruined. But for Will Smith and all other blacks, a totally separate set of rules applies. Smith goes on to take further advantage of this discrepancy in racial standards by saying that Obama “has validated something that I've believed for a lot of years, that I've never really been able to say. People looked at me crazy, and as a black man you were never really allowed to say: You know, I don't think America is a racist nation. I think there are racist people that live here, but I think as a whole America is not a racist nation.You were Uncle Tom if you ever said that before. ... I think [his election] completed a cycle of African-American citizenship. It was like the last stamp on African-American citizenship, and no longer are we African-Americans. We are Americans of African descent.”
So even though blacks were emancipated over 140 years ago by the deaths of millions of white people, and even though millions of white people came to the defense of blacks during the process of desegregation more than forty years ago to further declare blacks as citizens, and even though some of the most powerful people in the government over the last twenty years have been black men and women, black citizenship wasn’t really official until a half-white/ half-Luo man became president. That is basically what will smith is saying. If this doesn’t strike you as racist, you are probably just high.
In his book “Dreams of my Father,” Barack Obama, himself half white, had this to say about his life amongst white people: “ We were always playing on the white man’s court…by the white man’s rules…any distinction between good and bad whites held negligible meaning… our rage at the white world needed no object.., no independent confirmation.” Barack Obama was raised partly in Indonesia and mostly in Hawaii. I wonder just how much racism he encountered growing up. In apparent disgust over his white heritage, Obama writes “ I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of twelve or thirteen… as I imagined myself following Malcom’s call, one line in [Malcom X’s] book stayed with me. He spoke of a wish he’d once had… that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged.” He then categorizes white people as “some cruel, some ignorant.” As if to explain his reason for making racist statements, Obama states that “race-bating could make up for a host of limitations” in the political world.
Please smack me in the face so that I can wake up from this nightmare of a world I am living in.
Now if you’re wondering where this is all going, or how it could end up even affecting you, consider the TKO super-combo of racism AND sexism known as Sonia Sotomayor. She has been nominated to the United States Supreme Court and will doubtless be approved as our newest justice. In one balls-to-the-walls, no-holds-barred, put up your dukes, eat my shorts statement, this bigoted old hack has managed to make official something that most people have sensed for a long time: whitey is going down. She did this by saying “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life”
If you think I’m just blowing hot air, take a look at her record. This is a judge whose rulings in the court of appeals have been overturned by the Supreme Court more than sixty percent of the time because her bias has led her to make extra-legal decisions. Even more disturbing is the fact that Sotomayor is a member of La Raza (meaning "the race"), a latino-pride orginization who advocates for amnesty for illegal aliens, and states their main objective to be the return of the western United States to Mexican authority and kicking out all non-Aztecas. Barack Obama campaigned on the promise that he would nominate judges who would rule in favor of minorities specifically because of their race, and conversely, judges who would rule against whites because of their race. He has now put his money where his teleprompter is. We have reached a point in our history where our government has loudly proclaimed itself unable to dispense blind justice. If the highest court in the land and the highest office in the land can’t be trusted to interpret the law in a manner that honors the constitution, what can they be trusted with?
As I’ve said before, right and wrong have simply traded places. Other than that, there has been no change. Racism against whites is just as racist as racism BY whites. But those with the means have been so successful in mixing up the race cards that they’ve actually convinced white Americans that they deserve to be punished for the crimes of a few long-dead white people. I for one will not be apologizing to minorities as they march me to the gas chamber.
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
INTERLUDE
It has come to my attention that, after just two posts and an inconsequential number of readers, almost half of you are struggling with the material in this blog. You can not see the connections between the things in my writings. You don’t understand how they are linked. I will explain this once. This blog and the “Red, White, and Bruised” series are about America and all things wrong with it. If this simple premise is too mind-boggling and you really can’t draw the connections, or if it takes too much work to read multiple paragraphs at one time, or if you truly don’t have the mental energy it takes to do a little research to discover for yourself that the statements in these writings are not subjective opinions but facts, then perhaps http://www.sesamestreet.org/home would be more appropriate for your intellectual capacity.
This blog is for people who love America and are willing to at least put in the book time required to justify the way they vote and think. It is for people who treasure the US Constitution in their hearts, and understand that even the most remotely socialistic of policies is in direct conflict with the liberties outlined in the foundational laws of this great nation. This blog is for people who prefer to do their own thinking, rather than contracting out their thinking to regional trend-setters. This blog is for people who don’t turn off the news
Before I post any further writings, I ask that you take a few days to read the Constitution, with special consideration for the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence and actually try to think about what these articles mean to you. You must grasp these elementary pre-reqs before you can even begin to understand the dangers to the nation which I will outline in writings to come. And if this simple assignment takes too much effort on your part, forget it. This blog is not for you. Go back to your reality tv shows, your Daily Show, your NPR. Don’t trouble yourself with the truth. Let those who genuinely care about freedom do the heavy lifting required to maintain such. In fact, if you are one of the millions of thoughtless, spoiled, lazy American ingrates who have allowed themselves to be brainwashed into thinking that socialism has a place in America, take a hike to Canada and stay there. This COUNTRY is not for you.
This blog is for people who love America and are willing to at least put in the book time required to justify the way they vote and think. It is for people who treasure the US Constitution in their hearts, and understand that even the most remotely socialistic of policies is in direct conflict with the liberties outlined in the foundational laws of this great nation. This blog is for people who prefer to do their own thinking, rather than contracting out their thinking to regional trend-setters. This blog is for people who don’t turn off the news
Before I post any further writings, I ask that you take a few days to read the Constitution, with special consideration for the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence and actually try to think about what these articles mean to you. You must grasp these elementary pre-reqs before you can even begin to understand the dangers to the nation which I will outline in writings to come. And if this simple assignment takes too much effort on your part, forget it. This blog is not for you. Go back to your reality tv shows, your Daily Show, your NPR. Don’t trouble yourself with the truth. Let those who genuinely care about freedom do the heavy lifting required to maintain such. In fact, if you are one of the millions of thoughtless, spoiled, lazy American ingrates who have allowed themselves to be brainwashed into thinking that socialism has a place in America, take a hike to Canada and stay there. This COUNTRY is not for you.
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Red, White, and Bruised (part two)
Consider the following questions. What do the words “liberty” and “freedom” mean to you? Do you believe that the Constitution of the United States of America more closely represents the meanings of these words than any other governing document or set of laws that the ruling forces of the world have ever composed? Do you believe that it is wrong for the United States to continue to promote and defend the philosophical freedoms, cultural heritage, and restrictions on government that have protected and empowered the people since the nation was founded?
If you can not answer these questions without hesitation, discomfort, guilt of conscience, or internal conflict, it is because your natural ability to define the difference between right and wrong has been systematically and deliberately compromised and undermined from the time that you were first able to comprehend language. Here you will find evidence which sustains this claim, and hopefully you will come to understand why the reclamation of your own moral compass may be the only thing that can save America from falling into the prison that is communism.
You may have noticed that since the “cultural revolution” of the 1960’s, countless lives have seemingly derailed and fallen into a bottomless pit of sex, drugs, and moral apathy. But while most people recognize this to be tragic to some degree, most people are indifferent to the millions of lives which are wasted in pursuit of socially-destructive rebellion against family structure, religious observance, patriotism, and the traditional concept of civilized behavior. It is no coincidence that the disintegration of democratic society always commences after the abandonment of the social moral code. For America, the decline of national stability began at the time that the practitioners of Marxism began successfully putting into effect the infiltration tactics of Antonio Gramsci in an effort to eventually gain political control of the United States of America.
Antonio Gramsci was an Italian neo-Marxist philosopher who wrote extensively on the evils of capitalism. He suggested that democracy was merely a tool which the wealthy "bourgeois" used to coerce the lower classes into devoting themselves to a life of hard labor, whereby the rich become richer, and the poor die from rickets. In the world of democracy, as Gramsci saw it, there were two classes: the oppressed, and those who oppress them. Consider this analogy. As far as Gramsci was concerned, the oppressive class could be represented by a wealthy merchant who rides atop a wagon full of valuable goods which he hopes to transport to a nearby village and trade for monetary gain. The oppressed or “proletariat” class is represented by the hungry donkey that pulls the merchant’s wagon. In order to motivate the donkey into pulling the wagon, the merchant dangles a carrot just out of reach of said donkey, which carrot represents the idea of democracy in this analogy.
The donkey sees the carrot as a satisfactory reward for his labors and will pull the wagon indefinitely as long as the merchant waves it in front of him. In the Marxist’s concept of democratic societies, almost everyone is a donkey, duped into believing that if we work very hard we can be rewarded with the “carrot” of freedom to do whatever we want. We believe that we willingly pull the wagon because the carrot is worth the pull. But in reality we never get to experience the joy of democracy because we are so busy laboring that we never get the chance to stop and nibble on it.
So in place of the rigged game of capitalism, Gramsci argued for communism. The goal of communism is to eliminate all social classes by homogenizing the lifestyle of all people. No one can ever progress beyond the stature of his neighbors. The government accomplishes this perceived “equality” by controlling virtually all aspects of the lives of the citizens. A maximum income level is set, curfews are enforced, housing is the same for everyone, a national religion is usually established, and political parties are narrowed to one or two mega-parties. By eliminating the freedom of the people to choose how they live, there is no avenue to allow for a scheming rich person to take advantage of others. If a poor person has nothing better to work towards, he can’t be convinced to work harder. In the communist system, the only reason people are motivated to work is because they know they will starve to death if they do not. Save it be for mere survival, there is nothing else to work for.
In the eyes of Gramsci and all Marxists like him, the bullies and opportunists at the top of the democratic pyramid had to be knocked down and replaced with well-meaning and compassionate communist leaders. But where most proponents of communism advocated for a militant takeover, Gramsci was astute enough to recognize that republican ideals were too strongly entrenched in the United States to be eradicated the old fashioned way. So Gramsci suggested a Trojan horse method. He called it “the long march through the institutions.”
The plan was to plant communist sympathizers in positions as teachers, deans, professors, civic leaders, civil rights advocates, preachers, and other “noble” leadership positions that people would trust and be easily persuaded by. These leaders and teachers would then gradually introduce counter-cultural ideas, slowly building a posterity of “revolutionaries,” with each subsequent generation accepting a higher degree of anti-American values than the previous generation.
Gramsci and his contemporaries knew, however, that there would still be many people who opposed communism in principle. They also knew that a large segment of society would end up on the fence, too lazy or too indecisive to declare a preference in form of government. To deal with these stragglers and stubborn non-conformists, communists simply had to trick these people into submission. This would be accomplished by controlling the language used in reference to politics, religion, and other prominent issues of discussion. Through the use of news media, books, magazines, popular music and other forms of entertainment, as well as the curriculum used in the education system, the very meanings of words could be changed. By reassigning meanings to words such as revolution, Christianity, power, freedom, terrorist, wealth, and other politically polarizing terms, the public’s perception of “right” and “wrong” could be totally manipulated.
Once the communist posterity is raised and all others are tricked into believing that capitalism is evil and/or doomed to failure, enough people will either openly support communism or unknowingly support communist agendas in disguise to allow for communism to quietly replace capitalism through the election process, thus rendering any violent takeover unnecessary. So, to refer back to the thesis of this series, right and wrong have traded places. By changing the way the public views our enemies and our threats, as well as demonizing the values and principles that have made our country strong, the supporters of communism have undermined your ability to judge what is good for the country and what is bad for the country. They have created a culture where conservative values are demonized and sexual promiscuity is promoted. They have convinced the people that it is right to do whatever feels good, and the only thing that is wrong is to deny yourself and others the right to openly party and fornicate. They have deliberately produced a society in which “morality” is considered an outdated tool of the oppressive class, and in so doing they have undermined the sustainability of the United States as a democratic nation. By erasing the traditional concept of what is right, and replacing it with an acceptance of carnal indulgence, the enemies of liberty have eliminated the threat of opposition from those who otherwise would still believe in the conservative values that sustain democracy.
If you think I’m paranoid or even intentionally lying, just consider these indisputable facts. The politicians, lawyers, soldiers, border agents, investigators, and all others who have actively fought the rise of Islamic terrorism are now being categorized as dangerous enemies of freedom by the new president and those who work with him in the government. At the same time, hundreds of terrorists are now anticipating liberation from our detention centers, and those who remain detained will now enjoy a comfortable existence devoid of any harsh interrogation tactics that have previously saved countless American lives. Our old democratic allies are being cut off, while new friendships are being forged with rogue states such as Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, Nicaragua, and others who have openly professed their hatred for America. The current president has stated numerous times that the Constitution is generally worthless, and if he could, he would trash it. And to show that he means business, his newly reorganized Department of Homeland Security has labeled as “extremists” all Americans who openly fight to maintain and support the Constitution.
If we as Americans do not come to our senses and boldly declare the constitution as valid, re-establish the boundaries of right and wrong, and get back to our cultural and political roots, the world’s greatest beacon of hope and liberty will be no more. The flag is being torn apart, trampled under-foot, and burnt in the streets. If we do not protect it, then the rights and liberties it symbolizes will be lost with it.
If you can not answer these questions without hesitation, discomfort, guilt of conscience, or internal conflict, it is because your natural ability to define the difference between right and wrong has been systematically and deliberately compromised and undermined from the time that you were first able to comprehend language. Here you will find evidence which sustains this claim, and hopefully you will come to understand why the reclamation of your own moral compass may be the only thing that can save America from falling into the prison that is communism.
You may have noticed that since the “cultural revolution” of the 1960’s, countless lives have seemingly derailed and fallen into a bottomless pit of sex, drugs, and moral apathy. But while most people recognize this to be tragic to some degree, most people are indifferent to the millions of lives which are wasted in pursuit of socially-destructive rebellion against family structure, religious observance, patriotism, and the traditional concept of civilized behavior. It is no coincidence that the disintegration of democratic society always commences after the abandonment of the social moral code. For America, the decline of national stability began at the time that the practitioners of Marxism began successfully putting into effect the infiltration tactics of Antonio Gramsci in an effort to eventually gain political control of the United States of America.
Antonio Gramsci was an Italian neo-Marxist philosopher who wrote extensively on the evils of capitalism. He suggested that democracy was merely a tool which the wealthy "bourgeois" used to coerce the lower classes into devoting themselves to a life of hard labor, whereby the rich become richer, and the poor die from rickets. In the world of democracy, as Gramsci saw it, there were two classes: the oppressed, and those who oppress them. Consider this analogy. As far as Gramsci was concerned, the oppressive class could be represented by a wealthy merchant who rides atop a wagon full of valuable goods which he hopes to transport to a nearby village and trade for monetary gain. The oppressed or “proletariat” class is represented by the hungry donkey that pulls the merchant’s wagon. In order to motivate the donkey into pulling the wagon, the merchant dangles a carrot just out of reach of said donkey, which carrot represents the idea of democracy in this analogy.
The donkey sees the carrot as a satisfactory reward for his labors and will pull the wagon indefinitely as long as the merchant waves it in front of him. In the Marxist’s concept of democratic societies, almost everyone is a donkey, duped into believing that if we work very hard we can be rewarded with the “carrot” of freedom to do whatever we want. We believe that we willingly pull the wagon because the carrot is worth the pull. But in reality we never get to experience the joy of democracy because we are so busy laboring that we never get the chance to stop and nibble on it.
So in place of the rigged game of capitalism, Gramsci argued for communism. The goal of communism is to eliminate all social classes by homogenizing the lifestyle of all people. No one can ever progress beyond the stature of his neighbors. The government accomplishes this perceived “equality” by controlling virtually all aspects of the lives of the citizens. A maximum income level is set, curfews are enforced, housing is the same for everyone, a national religion is usually established, and political parties are narrowed to one or two mega-parties. By eliminating the freedom of the people to choose how they live, there is no avenue to allow for a scheming rich person to take advantage of others. If a poor person has nothing better to work towards, he can’t be convinced to work harder. In the communist system, the only reason people are motivated to work is because they know they will starve to death if they do not. Save it be for mere survival, there is nothing else to work for.
In the eyes of Gramsci and all Marxists like him, the bullies and opportunists at the top of the democratic pyramid had to be knocked down and replaced with well-meaning and compassionate communist leaders. But where most proponents of communism advocated for a militant takeover, Gramsci was astute enough to recognize that republican ideals were too strongly entrenched in the United States to be eradicated the old fashioned way. So Gramsci suggested a Trojan horse method. He called it “the long march through the institutions.”
The plan was to plant communist sympathizers in positions as teachers, deans, professors, civic leaders, civil rights advocates, preachers, and other “noble” leadership positions that people would trust and be easily persuaded by. These leaders and teachers would then gradually introduce counter-cultural ideas, slowly building a posterity of “revolutionaries,” with each subsequent generation accepting a higher degree of anti-American values than the previous generation.
Gramsci and his contemporaries knew, however, that there would still be many people who opposed communism in principle. They also knew that a large segment of society would end up on the fence, too lazy or too indecisive to declare a preference in form of government. To deal with these stragglers and stubborn non-conformists, communists simply had to trick these people into submission. This would be accomplished by controlling the language used in reference to politics, religion, and other prominent issues of discussion. Through the use of news media, books, magazines, popular music and other forms of entertainment, as well as the curriculum used in the education system, the very meanings of words could be changed. By reassigning meanings to words such as revolution, Christianity, power, freedom, terrorist, wealth, and other politically polarizing terms, the public’s perception of “right” and “wrong” could be totally manipulated.
Once the communist posterity is raised and all others are tricked into believing that capitalism is evil and/or doomed to failure, enough people will either openly support communism or unknowingly support communist agendas in disguise to allow for communism to quietly replace capitalism through the election process, thus rendering any violent takeover unnecessary. So, to refer back to the thesis of this series, right and wrong have traded places. By changing the way the public views our enemies and our threats, as well as demonizing the values and principles that have made our country strong, the supporters of communism have undermined your ability to judge what is good for the country and what is bad for the country. They have created a culture where conservative values are demonized and sexual promiscuity is promoted. They have convinced the people that it is right to do whatever feels good, and the only thing that is wrong is to deny yourself and others the right to openly party and fornicate. They have deliberately produced a society in which “morality” is considered an outdated tool of the oppressive class, and in so doing they have undermined the sustainability of the United States as a democratic nation. By erasing the traditional concept of what is right, and replacing it with an acceptance of carnal indulgence, the enemies of liberty have eliminated the threat of opposition from those who otherwise would still believe in the conservative values that sustain democracy.
If you think I’m paranoid or even intentionally lying, just consider these indisputable facts. The politicians, lawyers, soldiers, border agents, investigators, and all others who have actively fought the rise of Islamic terrorism are now being categorized as dangerous enemies of freedom by the new president and those who work with him in the government. At the same time, hundreds of terrorists are now anticipating liberation from our detention centers, and those who remain detained will now enjoy a comfortable existence devoid of any harsh interrogation tactics that have previously saved countless American lives. Our old democratic allies are being cut off, while new friendships are being forged with rogue states such as Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, Nicaragua, and others who have openly professed their hatred for America. The current president has stated numerous times that the Constitution is generally worthless, and if he could, he would trash it. And to show that he means business, his newly reorganized Department of Homeland Security has labeled as “extremists” all Americans who openly fight to maintain and support the Constitution.
If we as Americans do not come to our senses and boldly declare the constitution as valid, re-establish the boundaries of right and wrong, and get back to our cultural and political roots, the world’s greatest beacon of hope and liberty will be no more. The flag is being torn apart, trampled under-foot, and burnt in the streets. If we do not protect it, then the rights and liberties it symbolizes will be lost with it.
Friday, April 17, 2009
Red, White, and Bruised (part one)
Once upon a time there was a man who craved great power. So to obtain it, he began to campaign and seek election. He knew that if he wanted to win favor with the majority of the people, he simply needed to promise them everything they wanted. He knew that the masses were uneducated, lazy, and extremely gullible, and that they would never question the feasibility of his promises. He knew that the people were tired of war, that they were hungry for change, and that they wanted to be taken care of. So, equipped with his charisma and his gift for oratory, he used every forum of communication available to broadcast his clever message and mesmerize his followers. He used these same tools of cunning and charm to trample and embarrass his opponents, who were not as skilled in the art of language and who resembled the "old fashioned" form of government too closely for the liking of the voters.
This man built his candidacy on a foundation of deceit, fear mongering, popular fashion, and catchy body language. Simply by acting in a way that he knew people would relate to, he was able to take control of his country and execute his agenda. By promising change, protection, jobs, food, and a sense of destiny, he was able to take the election. But almost immediately after he assumed his new position, he began abandoning his promises. Not only was he unwilling to be the "people's leader" that he claimed he would be, but he began governing in a manner which was more totalitarian and dictator-like than his opponents ever threatened to be. He went to work on issuing order after order, appointing countless czars, building a civilian security force to rival the military, and robbing his people of power and liberties. He began spying on ordinary citizens, listening in on private conversations, and pressuring the media to silence any voice of opposition.
Who am I talking about? Is it Adolph Hitler, or perhaps the current U.S. President? What is terrifying is that both of these men fit comfortably within these characteristics. Because this is the pattern that virtually every single dictator, tyrant, and despot in the history of human governance has used to gain political prominence. The media wants us to believe that this era in American history is historic. Perhaps it is. Only it is not historic in that it is unique or fresh or enlightened. This era is historic because for the first time in the United States of America, we are repeating a pattern of history which is in direct conflict with the principles upon which this nation was founded: we are willingly walking into a trap of total government control.
Recent polls show that less than 60% of Americans prefer a free market over communism. The people have elected a Marxist to the office of president. The government has declared all conservatives and patriots to be a threat to the security of the nation, a measure that seeks to enforce not just rules against actions, but restrictions on thoughts and ideals. The president promised that things would "change" in America. So far, the greatest change that I can see is that right and wrong have traded places.
This man built his candidacy on a foundation of deceit, fear mongering, popular fashion, and catchy body language. Simply by acting in a way that he knew people would relate to, he was able to take control of his country and execute his agenda. By promising change, protection, jobs, food, and a sense of destiny, he was able to take the election. But almost immediately after he assumed his new position, he began abandoning his promises. Not only was he unwilling to be the "people's leader" that he claimed he would be, but he began governing in a manner which was more totalitarian and dictator-like than his opponents ever threatened to be. He went to work on issuing order after order, appointing countless czars, building a civilian security force to rival the military, and robbing his people of power and liberties. He began spying on ordinary citizens, listening in on private conversations, and pressuring the media to silence any voice of opposition.
Who am I talking about? Is it Adolph Hitler, or perhaps the current U.S. President? What is terrifying is that both of these men fit comfortably within these characteristics. Because this is the pattern that virtually every single dictator, tyrant, and despot in the history of human governance has used to gain political prominence. The media wants us to believe that this era in American history is historic. Perhaps it is. Only it is not historic in that it is unique or fresh or enlightened. This era is historic because for the first time in the United States of America, we are repeating a pattern of history which is in direct conflict with the principles upon which this nation was founded: we are willingly walking into a trap of total government control.
Recent polls show that less than 60% of Americans prefer a free market over communism. The people have elected a Marxist to the office of president. The government has declared all conservatives and patriots to be a threat to the security of the nation, a measure that seeks to enforce not just rules against actions, but restrictions on thoughts and ideals. The president promised that things would "change" in America. So far, the greatest change that I can see is that right and wrong have traded places.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
