I've been slowly working on a piece that I think gets to the meat of all the problems we face in our country and in the world today. But I keep stopping myself and re-working it because, as I've always known, no one cares about anything I write. Also, nothing I can write or say can mean anything or make any difference to an audience that has never read the thoughts and philosophies of wise and virtuous men like John Adams. If you can't be convinced by the priceless papers and letters and speeches mined as diamonds from the depths of such noble minds, no arrangement of words that I could produce could ever bring you to recognize that we are in the process of societal collapse. As an example of the wisdom of John Adams, take this segment of a letter he wrote to one of his grandsons. I think it is because we are lacking leaders of this sentiment that we find ourselves in the serious times we are in. And so, without further ramblings from the likes of me, I give you President Adams.
"Oh, that I may always be able to say to my grandsons, 'You have learned much and behaved well, my lads. Go on and improve in everything worthy.' Have you considered the meaning of that word "worthy"? Weigh it well... I had rather you should be worthy possessors of one thousand pounds honestly acquired by your own labor and industry, than ten millions by banks and tricks. I should rather you be worthy shoemakers than secretaries of states or treasury acquired by libels in newspapers. I had rather you should be worthy makers of brooms and baskets than unworthy presidents of the United States procured by intrigue, factious slander and corruption."
This was written to a grandson, but it could have been written for any of us, even in our day. If John Adams could see us and our politicians now!
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
this also is not a real post
Well, this is actually more postier than the last non-post, but it's not the big one I promised. I just wanted to take one more opportunity to gripe about the current state of the government's campaign to kill you with crappy healthcare. Liberals like to believe that they have the market cornered on humanity and compassion and equality and other such abstract concepts. They try to say that conservatives only have compassion for other conservatives, and if you want to learn the worth of a human you need to look to a democrat. But now the democrats are showing us exactly what they think a human life is worth by comparing human beings to automobiles, and the irony of that seems to only mean anything to me.
In an effort to persuade you to believe that you should be required by law to purchase health insurance, Obama and his army of hell-spawned demons and prostitutes known as the democratic party have been using the analogy of car insurance. Obama says that requiring people to own health insurance is exactly the same as requiring people to own car insurance. If you don't own health insurance, Obama wants to fine you and maybe even throw you in jail. Same thing as car insurance, for those who drive cars. But here's the thing that they hope you're too stupid to think of. If you don't own health insurance, the odds of that choice having any negative effects on anyone other than you are probably zilch. If I drive my car through a red light and total another person's car and it turns out I don't have car insurance, that person might have to pay for all of the damage I caused them. That would truly suck. But if I don't have health insurance, the worst thing that could happen would be that I get tuberculosis and have to borrow money from someone to pay my medical bills and I forget to pay them back. Big freaking deal.
My point is, they want you to believe that they're "reforming" healthcare out of compassion and humanity. And yet, in their attempts to explain their objective, they've completely removed the human element and they are now treating the issue as a raw business scenario. This is one more glaring piece of evidence that shows the real goal of "healthcare reform," which is dominating your life in every imaginable way as a means of getting more money and power. So if Obama wants to use this analogy, it should work in both directions . Since Obama wants to force health insurance companies to cover people with the worst of pre-existing conditions, I think we should also require car insurance companies to cover people with cars that have pre-existing conditions, such as bald tires and exhausted brake pads, missing mirrors, bent chassis, and rusty old dents. Come on, Barry, you heavy-handed, arrogant pimp. I thought you were supposed to be smart. I really expected better quality work out of this guy. I'm really please that he's going out of his way to show us that he's actually just a retarded gangster.
In an effort to persuade you to believe that you should be required by law to purchase health insurance, Obama and his army of hell-spawned demons and prostitutes known as the democratic party have been using the analogy of car insurance. Obama says that requiring people to own health insurance is exactly the same as requiring people to own car insurance. If you don't own health insurance, Obama wants to fine you and maybe even throw you in jail. Same thing as car insurance, for those who drive cars. But here's the thing that they hope you're too stupid to think of. If you don't own health insurance, the odds of that choice having any negative effects on anyone other than you are probably zilch. If I drive my car through a red light and total another person's car and it turns out I don't have car insurance, that person might have to pay for all of the damage I caused them. That would truly suck. But if I don't have health insurance, the worst thing that could happen would be that I get tuberculosis and have to borrow money from someone to pay my medical bills and I forget to pay them back. Big freaking deal.
My point is, they want you to believe that they're "reforming" healthcare out of compassion and humanity. And yet, in their attempts to explain their objective, they've completely removed the human element and they are now treating the issue as a raw business scenario. This is one more glaring piece of evidence that shows the real goal of "healthcare reform," which is dominating your life in every imaginable way as a means of getting more money and power. So if Obama wants to use this analogy, it should work in both directions . Since Obama wants to force health insurance companies to cover people with the worst of pre-existing conditions, I think we should also require car insurance companies to cover people with cars that have pre-existing conditions, such as bald tires and exhausted brake pads, missing mirrors, bent chassis, and rusty old dents. Come on, Barry, you heavy-handed, arrogant pimp. I thought you were supposed to be smart. I really expected better quality work out of this guy. I'm really please that he's going out of his way to show us that he's actually just a retarded gangster.
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
almost a real post
This post is so unreal that I am not even going to capitalize any letters in the tite. However, I am going to put a real post up here sometime in the next week, one which will cause you to scoop your lefty liberal eyes out with a Mcflurry spoon and replace them with Cadbury eggs. But in the meantime, click on this: http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/09/taking_liberties/entry5595506.shtml?tag=mncol;txt and read the article. I know this might shock all four of you, but I'm not liberal in any way. But this story disturbs me beyond explanation. K I love you. Bye.
Love,
The American
Love,
The American
Monday, October 5, 2009
More on Losers
I want to talk some more about losers, and while it's a fact that the half of you who have ever voted Democrat are losers, I'm actually not talking about you guys. Unless you've been on a drunken cocaine binge for the last three days, you've probably become aware of the "news" of David Letterman's latest self-imposed troubles. Apparently David Letterman has somehow been able to convince women other than his wife to have sex with him, and some other loser at CBS found out and tried to use what he knew about the affairs to blackmail Letterman out of two million dollars. Short story made shorter, Letterman told the cops and then decided to haunt the dreams of children everywhere by telling the entire world what he had done with these shameless/desperate-for-a-promotion/really gross women he works with.
And if you're wondering why I'm mentioning David Letterman for the second time in less than a week, it's not because I'm turning this into a celebrity gossip blog. This is actually a continuation of my last post, and it fits in perfectly with the purpose of this blog, which is to explain to you lazy stupid apes why liberalism is the anti-Christ. The secondary purpose of this blog is to insult anyone who reads it. So the point I want to make with the case of David Letterman is how emblematic he is of the typical liberal with a perverted ax to grind. If you didn't already know, David Letterman loves to make dirty, low-brow jokes about all kinds of conservative politicians, and conservative people in general, and he specializes in making creepy jokes about Sarah Palin. Now, I'm not a big supporter of Palin or any Republicans, but I'm willing to bet that Sarah Palin is a far better, much more morally admirable person than the scumhole David Letterman.
In the 68-and-a-half years that I've been alive, my observations have made me familiar with the most important law of nature, which is that dirty minds always gravitate toward liberalism as a means of self-preservation. And to ensure self-preservation, liberals(perverted dirtbags), will attack all virtue and all truth with no concern for decency or honesty, or even logic. David Letterman, being a nasty old fartbag infidel, fulfills this natural law by cheating on his wife over and over, and then ignores honesty and logic and decency by finding the audacity to take cheap shots at Sarah Palin and everyone like her.
You might say that David Letterman is just an entertainer and nothing that he says really matters anyway. Not true. I believe that the attacks against traditional values by radical leftists in the entertainment industry were largely responsible for the election of the current set of radically-left leaders in our government. Because when thoughtless, gullible, easily-manipulated zombies who NEVER follow the news or think for themselves or study history or politics tune in to some tv show they believe is nonpartisan and get doused in one-sided political trash talk, they tend to go along with whatever the people on that tv show are saying. And without even realizing it, anyone who takes their marching orders from someone like David Letterman is taking orders from a terrible, lying, piece of filth that should never be trusted by anyone.
But this isn't just about David Letterman, it's about virtually everyone in entertainment, and also every liberal politician, and most people who vote for them. And the point I want to make is the same point I made in my last post, which is that liberals are all shameful home wrecking perverts, and to take their side requires either that you become like them, or that you lose your soul by ignoring the truth about the side you're taking.
And if you're wondering why I'm mentioning David Letterman for the second time in less than a week, it's not because I'm turning this into a celebrity gossip blog. This is actually a continuation of my last post, and it fits in perfectly with the purpose of this blog, which is to explain to you lazy stupid apes why liberalism is the anti-Christ. The secondary purpose of this blog is to insult anyone who reads it. So the point I want to make with the case of David Letterman is how emblematic he is of the typical liberal with a perverted ax to grind. If you didn't already know, David Letterman loves to make dirty, low-brow jokes about all kinds of conservative politicians, and conservative people in general, and he specializes in making creepy jokes about Sarah Palin. Now, I'm not a big supporter of Palin or any Republicans, but I'm willing to bet that Sarah Palin is a far better, much more morally admirable person than the scumhole David Letterman.
In the 68-and-a-half years that I've been alive, my observations have made me familiar with the most important law of nature, which is that dirty minds always gravitate toward liberalism as a means of self-preservation. And to ensure self-preservation, liberals(perverted dirtbags), will attack all virtue and all truth with no concern for decency or honesty, or even logic. David Letterman, being a nasty old fartbag infidel, fulfills this natural law by cheating on his wife over and over, and then ignores honesty and logic and decency by finding the audacity to take cheap shots at Sarah Palin and everyone like her.
You might say that David Letterman is just an entertainer and nothing that he says really matters anyway. Not true. I believe that the attacks against traditional values by radical leftists in the entertainment industry were largely responsible for the election of the current set of radically-left leaders in our government. Because when thoughtless, gullible, easily-manipulated zombies who NEVER follow the news or think for themselves or study history or politics tune in to some tv show they believe is nonpartisan and get doused in one-sided political trash talk, they tend to go along with whatever the people on that tv show are saying. And without even realizing it, anyone who takes their marching orders from someone like David Letterman is taking orders from a terrible, lying, piece of filth that should never be trusted by anyone.
But this isn't just about David Letterman, it's about virtually everyone in entertainment, and also every liberal politician, and most people who vote for them. And the point I want to make is the same point I made in my last post, which is that liberals are all shameful home wrecking perverts, and to take their side requires either that you become like them, or that you lose your soul by ignoring the truth about the side you're taking.
Friday, October 2, 2009
Red, White, and Bruised (part five): The Real Goal of Liberalism
The other day I was soaking in my bathtub, thinking about the condemnation of God that our species will soon bring upon ourselves, and wondering how we’ve arrived at the place we’re now at where we actually have to explain to our leaders why communism is bad. And just as I was about to drop the toaster into the tub, it came to me. The pattern our society is currently going through is historically redundant, and the engine that drives society to such a set of events is always the same: liberalism. Or as I like to call it: immorality. I’ve been trying to figure out the point of liberal politics my whole life. Is it just power the liberals are after? Sometimes. Is it greed? Frequently, yes. But I’ve recently come to understand that the one thing that all liberals really want is to destroy the world. I know it sounds crazy, but keep reading and see what I mean.
First let’s look at some of the prominent figures in modern liberal politics. Take John Edwards, an ambulance-chasing attorney/politician hell-bent on working in the White House, this married man cheated on his terminally ill wife and fathered a child with his mistress and allegedly told her that if his current wife would just hurry up and die, he would marry her. Next, Ted Kennedy. This drunken meat-headed Irish bog goon murdered a girl named Mary Jo Kopechne in 1969 and got away with it because of his family name. His brothers, John and Bobby, also killed girls and got away with it, and all three were widely known to cheat on their wives on a constant basis. John and Bobby even liked to share their play things, like the good brothers they were.
Next up, Governor David Paterson of New York. The day after his inauguration, it was made known to the public that Paterson had been cheating on his wife. To be fair, it was also made public that Paterson’s wife was cheating on him, too. Although Paterson is obviously a big fan of heterosexual relations, he is known for his perpetual whining about the lack of benefits for gays. This dirt bag took office immediately after Eliot Spitzer, another liberal who left office after an investigation into his personal life revealed that he had spent close to $100,000 on prostitutes during his time as a public servant.
Now, I should just include the entire state of Oregon on this list. If you’ve never been to Oregon, you’re lucky. It gives new meaning to the phrase “den of iniquity.” With public sex shows, repeated attempts at legalizing gay marriage, doctor assisted suicide, and a general atmosphere of depravity, Oregon would make Caligula blush. But to avoid getting off track, I’ll stick to political leaders/participants. So next on the list is Stu Rasmussen, the mayor of Silverton, Oregon. Stu is known as the first openly transgender mayor in the United States. I don’t know how deep his transformation from man to woman has gone, but it’s safe to say that the guy is no Ronald Reagan. Also worth mentioning is the mayor of Portland, the very gay Sam Adams. Even though Adams’ political views are radically liberal, Sam has managed to overshadow those views by what a loser he is in his personal life. Besides being a deadbeat who doesn’t pay his bills, Sammy boy is most famous for having sexual relations with a male intern in a bathroom in city hall. The intern, by the way, was under the age of eighteen when the relations took place.
And since we’re already talking about elected officials who like to take advantage of their interns, who could be better suited to round out the topic than Bill Clinton? Let’s go with him. While big Bill was busy working at his desk in the oval office, little Billy was getting busy under the desk. While his wife was out shopping for new pant-suits, the President was back at the White House sodomizing his young female intern with cigars. That’s good smoking. Now I will bring to your attention Barack Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar,” Kevin Jennings, founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network. This first rate creep was teaching high school in Massachusetts back in 1988 when a fifteen year old student came to him and confessed that he had had sex with a man in his mid-twenties. Instead of contacting the police or telling his superiors, Jennings ignored the law against sodomizing minors and counseled the boy to be sure to use a condom when screwing around with older men.
Before I move on, the one participant in liberal politics that must be included here is the entire community of Hollywood. A network of smut-producing, propaganda-disseminating, fake news reporting, sexually-deviant, drugged-out flunkees with a combined worth of trillions of dollars, Hollywood is the all-powerful mouth that vomits liberal filth and lies all over the planet and enlists foul-mouhted perverts and losers like David Letterman and Bill Maher to convince gullible retarded people like you to vote for gangsters like Barack Obama.
I could go on and write almost forever about examples of liberals known for being creeps, but I honestly believe that there’s not enough bandwidth in the entire World Wide Web to post such a list. Now, it was while I thought about the kind of people that make up the liberal political machine that I decided to compare them to the kind of legislation the liberals are famous for: gay marriage, gay curriculum in public schools, publicly funded abortion, human euthanasia, forced tolerance of Muslims that want to chop our heads off, forced tolerance of public displays of sexual perversion, making it illegal to even mention god or Jesus in public or to display a symbol of a mainstream religion, etc. etc. So when I look at the laws the liberals are known for, and line them up with the shameful people who promote such laws, it becomes clear to me that the real goal of liberalism is to create a society wherein perverts, child molesters, transsexuals, homosexuals, baby killers, mistress murderers, grifters, charlatans, gangsters, and head-chopping Muslims can do whatever they want, and people with traditional values go to jail for trying to speaking out against such behavior. That is the “fundamental change” Obama was talking about.
When you look at history, you will find that the fall of every great society is preceded by an overthrowing of all standards, combined with godlessness, laziness, corruption, and a persecution of people with traditional persuasions who speak in defense of family structure and modesty in both personal and public life. There are exceptions to this rule, such as the plague of the Black Death, volcanoes, and Vikings. But generally it is the moral decay of a society that brings down the defenses. It is the erosion within a society that makes outside attacks possible. Yet knowing this, liberals still want to go down that same old road to self destruction. Why? It is either because they don’t know history, or the only other option is that they know where we are headed, and that’s exactly where they want to go. Either way, their shifting of ancient standards will be our demise.
So, I’ve given only a few examples of the disgusting freaks that have risen to prominence in the left wing of American politics, but they are not unique. The liberal branch is riddled with a disease of corruption and moral filthiness. I honestly doubt that one could find even ten good liberals working in the government today, because the kinds of people who call for liberal social reforms and promote the left wing ideals are ALWAYS disgusting perverts. You might say that it’s not just Democrats who are guilty of such low standards, and you would be right to say so. But I would argue that the Republicans no longer represent conservative values anyway, so such a point would be irrelevant to make.
And now I have some questions. Knowing how wrong the liberal lifestyle is, and how dangerous their goals are, and how predominantly sleezy liberals are, how can any self respecting person get behind such a movement? How can you you associate yourself with such people? How can you claim to want what’s right for your family, or claim to do what’s right by your spouse, or claim to be honoring your heritage and your religion, and at the same time support and accept a political movement that is so clearly opposed to such claims? If you ask me, you have to be one of two things: ignorant of the facts, or out to destroy the world.
First let’s look at some of the prominent figures in modern liberal politics. Take John Edwards, an ambulance-chasing attorney/politician hell-bent on working in the White House, this married man cheated on his terminally ill wife and fathered a child with his mistress and allegedly told her that if his current wife would just hurry up and die, he would marry her. Next, Ted Kennedy. This drunken meat-headed Irish bog goon murdered a girl named Mary Jo Kopechne in 1969 and got away with it because of his family name. His brothers, John and Bobby, also killed girls and got away with it, and all three were widely known to cheat on their wives on a constant basis. John and Bobby even liked to share their play things, like the good brothers they were.
Next up, Governor David Paterson of New York. The day after his inauguration, it was made known to the public that Paterson had been cheating on his wife. To be fair, it was also made public that Paterson’s wife was cheating on him, too. Although Paterson is obviously a big fan of heterosexual relations, he is known for his perpetual whining about the lack of benefits for gays. This dirt bag took office immediately after Eliot Spitzer, another liberal who left office after an investigation into his personal life revealed that he had spent close to $100,000 on prostitutes during his time as a public servant.
Now, I should just include the entire state of Oregon on this list. If you’ve never been to Oregon, you’re lucky. It gives new meaning to the phrase “den of iniquity.” With public sex shows, repeated attempts at legalizing gay marriage, doctor assisted suicide, and a general atmosphere of depravity, Oregon would make Caligula blush. But to avoid getting off track, I’ll stick to political leaders/participants. So next on the list is Stu Rasmussen, the mayor of Silverton, Oregon. Stu is known as the first openly transgender mayor in the United States. I don’t know how deep his transformation from man to woman has gone, but it’s safe to say that the guy is no Ronald Reagan. Also worth mentioning is the mayor of Portland, the very gay Sam Adams. Even though Adams’ political views are radically liberal, Sam has managed to overshadow those views by what a loser he is in his personal life. Besides being a deadbeat who doesn’t pay his bills, Sammy boy is most famous for having sexual relations with a male intern in a bathroom in city hall. The intern, by the way, was under the age of eighteen when the relations took place.
And since we’re already talking about elected officials who like to take advantage of their interns, who could be better suited to round out the topic than Bill Clinton? Let’s go with him. While big Bill was busy working at his desk in the oval office, little Billy was getting busy under the desk. While his wife was out shopping for new pant-suits, the President was back at the White House sodomizing his young female intern with cigars. That’s good smoking. Now I will bring to your attention Barack Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar,” Kevin Jennings, founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network. This first rate creep was teaching high school in Massachusetts back in 1988 when a fifteen year old student came to him and confessed that he had had sex with a man in his mid-twenties. Instead of contacting the police or telling his superiors, Jennings ignored the law against sodomizing minors and counseled the boy to be sure to use a condom when screwing around with older men.
Before I move on, the one participant in liberal politics that must be included here is the entire community of Hollywood. A network of smut-producing, propaganda-disseminating, fake news reporting, sexually-deviant, drugged-out flunkees with a combined worth of trillions of dollars, Hollywood is the all-powerful mouth that vomits liberal filth and lies all over the planet and enlists foul-mouhted perverts and losers like David Letterman and Bill Maher to convince gullible retarded people like you to vote for gangsters like Barack Obama.
I could go on and write almost forever about examples of liberals known for being creeps, but I honestly believe that there’s not enough bandwidth in the entire World Wide Web to post such a list. Now, it was while I thought about the kind of people that make up the liberal political machine that I decided to compare them to the kind of legislation the liberals are famous for: gay marriage, gay curriculum in public schools, publicly funded abortion, human euthanasia, forced tolerance of Muslims that want to chop our heads off, forced tolerance of public displays of sexual perversion, making it illegal to even mention god or Jesus in public or to display a symbol of a mainstream religion, etc. etc. So when I look at the laws the liberals are known for, and line them up with the shameful people who promote such laws, it becomes clear to me that the real goal of liberalism is to create a society wherein perverts, child molesters, transsexuals, homosexuals, baby killers, mistress murderers, grifters, charlatans, gangsters, and head-chopping Muslims can do whatever they want, and people with traditional values go to jail for trying to speaking out against such behavior. That is the “fundamental change” Obama was talking about.
When you look at history, you will find that the fall of every great society is preceded by an overthrowing of all standards, combined with godlessness, laziness, corruption, and a persecution of people with traditional persuasions who speak in defense of family structure and modesty in both personal and public life. There are exceptions to this rule, such as the plague of the Black Death, volcanoes, and Vikings. But generally it is the moral decay of a society that brings down the defenses. It is the erosion within a society that makes outside attacks possible. Yet knowing this, liberals still want to go down that same old road to self destruction. Why? It is either because they don’t know history, or the only other option is that they know where we are headed, and that’s exactly where they want to go. Either way, their shifting of ancient standards will be our demise.
So, I’ve given only a few examples of the disgusting freaks that have risen to prominence in the left wing of American politics, but they are not unique. The liberal branch is riddled with a disease of corruption and moral filthiness. I honestly doubt that one could find even ten good liberals working in the government today, because the kinds of people who call for liberal social reforms and promote the left wing ideals are ALWAYS disgusting perverts. You might say that it’s not just Democrats who are guilty of such low standards, and you would be right to say so. But I would argue that the Republicans no longer represent conservative values anyway, so such a point would be irrelevant to make.
And now I have some questions. Knowing how wrong the liberal lifestyle is, and how dangerous their goals are, and how predominantly sleezy liberals are, how can any self respecting person get behind such a movement? How can you you associate yourself with such people? How can you claim to want what’s right for your family, or claim to do what’s right by your spouse, or claim to be honoring your heritage and your religion, and at the same time support and accept a political movement that is so clearly opposed to such claims? If you ask me, you have to be one of two things: ignorant of the facts, or out to destroy the world.
Friday, September 11, 2009
HEALTH
My mental state seems to reflect the health of this nation. This day, September 11th, will always affect me deeply and I will always remain patriotic in my reflection of that day. Take that however you will. But this day has been re-purposed as a day of promoting liberal agendas by serving liberal causes, never to mention why we remember this day. Like the sacred meaning of Christmas, the solemn memories of September 11, 2001 have been deemed offensive and politically-incorrect. This country is in bad hands, our safety is in bad hands, our memories are being drowned under a sea of radical agendas, and it is all giving me ulcers and depression. To hell with any of you who feel any differently about these things. You don't deserve the legacy you've inherited.
Thursday, August 27, 2009
CORRUPDATE
Jeffrey Immelt is also on the board of directors at the New York Federal Reserve Bank. What the hell?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)