The other day I was soaking in my bathtub, thinking about the condemnation of God that our species will soon bring upon ourselves, and wondering how we’ve arrived at the place we’re now at where we actually have to explain to our leaders why communism is bad. And just as I was about to drop the toaster into the tub, it came to me. The pattern our society is currently going through is historically redundant, and the engine that drives society to such a set of events is always the same: liberalism. Or as I like to call it: immorality. I’ve been trying to figure out the point of liberal politics my whole life. Is it just power the liberals are after? Sometimes. Is it greed? Frequently, yes. But I’ve recently come to understand that the one thing that all liberals really want is to destroy the world. I know it sounds crazy, but keep reading and see what I mean.
First let’s look at some of the prominent figures in modern liberal politics. Take John Edwards, an ambulance-chasing attorney/politician hell-bent on working in the White House, this married man cheated on his terminally ill wife and fathered a child with his mistress and allegedly told her that if his current wife would just hurry up and die, he would marry her. Next, Ted Kennedy. This drunken meat-headed Irish bog goon murdered a girl named Mary Jo Kopechne in 1969 and got away with it because of his family name. His brothers, John and Bobby, also killed girls and got away with it, and all three were widely known to cheat on their wives on a constant basis. John and Bobby even liked to share their play things, like the good brothers they were.
Next up, Governor David Paterson of New York. The day after his inauguration, it was made known to the public that Paterson had been cheating on his wife. To be fair, it was also made public that Paterson’s wife was cheating on him, too. Although Paterson is obviously a big fan of heterosexual relations, he is known for his perpetual whining about the lack of benefits for gays. This dirt bag took office immediately after Eliot Spitzer, another liberal who left office after an investigation into his personal life revealed that he had spent close to $100,000 on prostitutes during his time as a public servant.
Now, I should just include the entire state of Oregon on this list. If you’ve never been to Oregon, you’re lucky. It gives new meaning to the phrase “den of iniquity.” With public sex shows, repeated attempts at legalizing gay marriage, doctor assisted suicide, and a general atmosphere of depravity, Oregon would make Caligula blush. But to avoid getting off track, I’ll stick to political leaders/participants. So next on the list is Stu Rasmussen, the mayor of Silverton, Oregon. Stu is known as the first openly transgender mayor in the United States. I don’t know how deep his transformation from man to woman has gone, but it’s safe to say that the guy is no Ronald Reagan. Also worth mentioning is the mayor of Portland, the very gay Sam Adams. Even though Adams’ political views are radically liberal, Sam has managed to overshadow those views by what a loser he is in his personal life. Besides being a deadbeat who doesn’t pay his bills, Sammy boy is most famous for having sexual relations with a male intern in a bathroom in city hall. The intern, by the way, was under the age of eighteen when the relations took place.
And since we’re already talking about elected officials who like to take advantage of their interns, who could be better suited to round out the topic than Bill Clinton? Let’s go with him. While big Bill was busy working at his desk in the oval office, little Billy was getting busy under the desk. While his wife was out shopping for new pant-suits, the President was back at the White House sodomizing his young female intern with cigars. That’s good smoking. Now I will bring to your attention Barack Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar,” Kevin Jennings, founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network. This first rate creep was teaching high school in Massachusetts back in 1988 when a fifteen year old student came to him and confessed that he had had sex with a man in his mid-twenties. Instead of contacting the police or telling his superiors, Jennings ignored the law against sodomizing minors and counseled the boy to be sure to use a condom when screwing around with older men.
Before I move on, the one participant in liberal politics that must be included here is the entire community of Hollywood. A network of smut-producing, propaganda-disseminating, fake news reporting, sexually-deviant, drugged-out flunkees with a combined worth of trillions of dollars, Hollywood is the all-powerful mouth that vomits liberal filth and lies all over the planet and enlists foul-mouhted perverts and losers like David Letterman and Bill Maher to convince gullible retarded people like you to vote for gangsters like Barack Obama.
I could go on and write almost forever about examples of liberals known for being creeps, but I honestly believe that there’s not enough bandwidth in the entire World Wide Web to post such a list. Now, it was while I thought about the kind of people that make up the liberal political machine that I decided to compare them to the kind of legislation the liberals are famous for: gay marriage, gay curriculum in public schools, publicly funded abortion, human euthanasia, forced tolerance of Muslims that want to chop our heads off, forced tolerance of public displays of sexual perversion, making it illegal to even mention god or Jesus in public or to display a symbol of a mainstream religion, etc. etc. So when I look at the laws the liberals are known for, and line them up with the shameful people who promote such laws, it becomes clear to me that the real goal of liberalism is to create a society wherein perverts, child molesters, transsexuals, homosexuals, baby killers, mistress murderers, grifters, charlatans, gangsters, and head-chopping Muslims can do whatever they want, and people with traditional values go to jail for trying to speaking out against such behavior. That is the “fundamental change” Obama was talking about.
When you look at history, you will find that the fall of every great society is preceded by an overthrowing of all standards, combined with godlessness, laziness, corruption, and a persecution of people with traditional persuasions who speak in defense of family structure and modesty in both personal and public life. There are exceptions to this rule, such as the plague of the Black Death, volcanoes, and Vikings. But generally it is the moral decay of a society that brings down the defenses. It is the erosion within a society that makes outside attacks possible. Yet knowing this, liberals still want to go down that same old road to self destruction. Why? It is either because they don’t know history, or the only other option is that they know where we are headed, and that’s exactly where they want to go. Either way, their shifting of ancient standards will be our demise.
So, I’ve given only a few examples of the disgusting freaks that have risen to prominence in the left wing of American politics, but they are not unique. The liberal branch is riddled with a disease of corruption and moral filthiness. I honestly doubt that one could find even ten good liberals working in the government today, because the kinds of people who call for liberal social reforms and promote the left wing ideals are ALWAYS disgusting perverts. You might say that it’s not just Democrats who are guilty of such low standards, and you would be right to say so. But I would argue that the Republicans no longer represent conservative values anyway, so such a point would be irrelevant to make.
And now I have some questions. Knowing how wrong the liberal lifestyle is, and how dangerous their goals are, and how predominantly sleezy liberals are, how can any self respecting person get behind such a movement? How can you you associate yourself with such people? How can you claim to want what’s right for your family, or claim to do what’s right by your spouse, or claim to be honoring your heritage and your religion, and at the same time support and accept a political movement that is so clearly opposed to such claims? If you ask me, you have to be one of two things: ignorant of the facts, or out to destroy the world.
