***Before you read this post, please make yourself familiar with the Privacy Act of 1974.***
Not surprisingly, some of the feedback on my last post was so stupid I almost committed suicide. Let me make it even clearer for you dullards. The White House isn't just interested in things on the internet that spread "disinformation." They refer specifically to "rumors" said in "casual conversation." And when you hear such "rumors," you are asked to "flag" the White House and bring such disinformation to their attention so they can "keep track" of it. And what do they plan on doing with such information? Do you really believe that the White House, the most powerful institution in the world, with the ability to listen to anything being said within a half-mile of a cell phone, needs ordinary citizens to clue them in on what the people are saying about the "president" and his train wreck healthcare bill?
Wake up, you vegetable. This finger-pointing request is such a glaring violation of the freedom of speech, you ought to be ashamed of yourself for not catching it. There is nothing innocent when the executive branch of a government begins enlisting civilians in the hunt for people who make statements that stand in opposition to that executive branch. But wait, isn't Obama just trying to keep track of statements and things, and not people? No way, Che. What is a statement if not the will of an individual? Can you really incriminate a statement without incriminating the person who made it? Statements, or items of "information," or "rumors," if you will, do not form themselves out of thin air.
No, my fellow subjects. The "president" is fulfilling his campaign promise to create a civilian security force that will keep watch on their neighbors. With such a promise having been officially made already, there is no other interpretation. This is no small thing. It should be considered with the full gravity of the office behind it. We aren't talking about a private citizen asking a friend to look for mean things being said about them on facebook. It is the White House, the presidency. And this fishing trip goes way beyond their realm of power and spits on the back of the constitution that gives them that power. But that shouldn't surprise you either, since the "president" also told us during his campaign that he doesn't much care for the constitution. Oh, you don't believe me? Let me enlighten you. According to Barack Hussein Obama, "as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it's been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties."
Interpret that however you want, but if you interpret it any differently than I do, you are without a doubt an embarrassment to your ancestors.
